Developing clinical skills assessment modules for traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine in Korea: a participatory action research study
- Author:
Yoonjin JEONG
1
;
Seung Hwan MUN
;
Eunbyul CHO
;
Hye-Yoon LEE
;
Sang Woo SHIN
;
Soyeon KIM
;
Eui-hyoung HWANG
;
Man-suk HWANG
;
Eunseok KIM
;
Jungyun LEE
Author Information
- Publication Type:Research article
- From:Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions 2026;23(1):10-
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:0
-
Abstract:
Purpose:This study aimed to develop pilot clinical skills assessment (CSA) modules for Korean medicine-specific procedures and to examine their preliminary appropriateness, perceived necessity, and feasibility as a foundation for future licensing-related assessment development.
Methods:A participatory action research framework, supplemented by qualitative interviews, was used to develop 4 CSA modules—acupuncture, Chuna manual therapy, pulse diagnosis, and constitutional diagnosis—in collaboration with expert evaluators, students, and standardized patients. The modules were implemented as formative examinations for third-year Korean medicine students, after which semi-structured interviews were conducted to obtain feedback on module content, implementation processes, and scoring procedures. Each module was also reviewed using the RUMBA checklist (Realistic, Understandable, Measurable, Behavioral, and Achievable), together with ratings of perceived necessity and feasibility for possible future use in licensing-related assessment. Interview data were analyzed inductively at the level of individual responses and then compared across modules and participant groups.
Results:Qualitative analysis yielded 3 themes: content and scoring criteria, physical environment or simulators, and education or training. Participants emphasized the need to make key aspects of performance more observable, improve authenticity through simulators or task trainers, and strengthen the capacity of scoring systems to distinguish between levels of student performance. Across all modules, mean RUMBA scores were high in the understandable, behavioral, and achievable domains, whereas measurability was more problematic, especially for pulse diagnosis.
Conclusion:These pilot findings clarify both the strengths and the limitations of Korean medicine-specific CSA modules. The modules received favorable ratings for understandability and achievability, whereas lower ratings for measurability and realism identified priorities for refinement before wider use. This study provides preliminary guidance for the continued development and broader evaluation of Korean medicine-specific performance assessments.
