The Current Consensus on Salvage Surgery after Targeted Therapy for Advanced EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Author:
Yu-Wei LIU
1
;
Po-Chih CHANG
;
Jadzia Tin-Tsen CHOU
;
Shah-Hwa CHOU
Author Information
- Publication Type:Review
- From: Journal of Chest Surgery 2026;59(1):17-29
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: Salvage surgery is an emerging option for carefully selected patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose disease remains controlled on tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Fourteen retrospective series report median progression-free survival (PFS) of 14–52 months and overall survival (OS) often exceeding 3 years, suggesting better disease control than continued TKI therapy alone. Although PFS generally improves, some cohorts show no OS advantage, probably because effective post-progression treatments dilute survival differences. Non-surgical local consolidative therapies remain essential for oligometastatic disease; nevertheless, resection yields intact specimens for comprehensive pathologic and molecular analysis.Access to tissue permits earlier identification of resistance mechanisms—most commonly the T790M mutation—more accurate prognostication, and more precise systemic-therapy selection. Comprehensive sampling can also identify histologic transformation and compound mutations that precede radiologic progression. Adverse prognostic factors include older age, high preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels, advanced pathological T stage, programmed death-ligand 1 ≥1%, and spread through air spaces. Salvage surgery is feasible and effective in carefully selected patients, especially those with oligoresidual disease and favorable tumor biology. Patient selection should integrate performance status, anatomic extent, histopathology, and genomic profile through multidisciplinary discussions. Despite regional differences (e.g., higher EGFR-mutation prevalence and wider adoption of minimally invasive approaches in East Asia) oncologic outcomes are comparable when selection criteria are applied consistently. Prospective trials are warranted to validate these retrospective observations, refine selection algorithms, establish optimal timing, and clarify how surgery can best be integrated with next-generation targeted agents and immunotherapies.
