Outcomes of cranioplasty with customized artificial bone flap made by 3D printing technique in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
10.7461/jcen.2025.E2025.09.003
- Author:
Min Geun GIL
1
;
Sung-Tae KIM
;
Se Young PYO
;
Juwhan LEE
;
Jin LEE
;
Won Hee LEE
;
Keun Soo LEE
;
Sung-Chul JIN
;
Sung Hwa PAENG
;
Moo Seong KIM
;
Young Gyun JEONG
Author Information
1. Department of Neurosurgery, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
- Publication Type:Clinical Article
- From:Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery
2026;28(1):35-48
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Objective:This study compared clinical and cosmetic outcomes of cranioplasty using customized three-dimensional (3-D) printed implants versus autologous bone in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) after decompressive craniectomy (DC).
Methods:We retrospectively reviewed 50 patients who underwent cranioplasty after DC for aSAH between July 2018 and December 2023. Patients were divided into the three-dimensional cranioplasty(3-DC, n=26) and autologous bone cranioplasty (AC, n=24) groups. Demographics, aneurysm characteristics, surgical parameters, morphometric analysis of defect coverage, complications, and functional outcomes assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were compared.
Results:A total of 54 hemispheres underwent cranioplasty. Compared with AC, the 3-DC group had larger defects but achieved higher coverage (96.7% vs. 93.4%, p=0.044) and smaller residual defects (338.7±274.2 mm² vs. 528.5±331.3 mm², p=0.049). Complication rates were lower in 3-DC (9 cases) than AC (15 cases, p=0.0994). Wound dehiscence and fluid collection were more frequent with 3-DC, while bone flap resorption and epidural abscess occurred only with AC. Revision surgery was required in six patients, five initially treated with autologous bone. Neurological outcomes (mRS) were maintained or improved in both groups.
Conclusions:In aSAH patients undergoing cranioplasty after DC, customized 3-D printed implants achieved significantly better anatomical restoration and showed a numerical trend toward fewer complications compared with autologous bone. While AC remains feasible, its risks of resorption and infection often necessitate revision. 3-D printed implants may be considered a reasonable alternative, particularly in aSAH patients at higher risk of complications.
