Challenges and Controversies in Perioperative Immunotherapy in Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: An Optimistic Perspective
- Author:
Duk-ki KIM
1
;
Jeong Eun LEE
Author Information
- Publication Type:Review
- From:Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases 2026;89(2):184-192
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the treatment landscape of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), extending their role from metastatic to resectable disease. While neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapies have each shown clinical value, recent evidence suggests that a perioperative strategy—incorporating both preoperative and postoperative immune-based treatment—may provide more consistent and durable survival benefits, especially in stage IIIA and high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)–expressing tumors. Despite concerns about feasibility and immune-related adverse events, phase III trials such as CheckMate 816, KEYNOTE-671, and AEGEAN have demonstrated that perioperative chemoimmunotherapy is both effective and tolerable in real-world practice. This review examines the rationale, clinical trial data, patient selection criteria, and safety profile of perioperative immunotherapy, and argues for its increasing adoption as a strategic standard in eligible NSCLC patients. Additionally, emerging biomarkers and circulating tumor DNA-based minimal residual disease surveillance hold promise for refining precision of perioperative treatment. Taken together, the evidence supports perioperative immunotherapy as a forward-looking, evidence-based approach to improving outcomes in resectable NSCLC.
