Efficacy of intradialytic neuromuscular electrical stimulation and oral nutritional supplementation in hemodialysis patients: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial
- Author:
Jae Hyeon PARK
1
;
Jae Yoon PARK
;
Geum Sil LEE
;
Ran-hui CHA
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Kidney Research and Clinical Practice 2025;44(2):288-298
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: Sarcopenia is common in hemodialysis patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of simultaneous nutritional support and intradialytic neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in hemodialysis patients. Methods: We performed a 12-week, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. The participants were randomly assigned to the control group, the protein group (25 g of protein at every dialysis session), the NMES group (intradialytic NMES to quadriceps femoris muscles), and the NMES + P group (NMES with protein supplementation). The primary outcome was the difference in hand grip strength (HGS) and leg muscle strength (LMS) among groups. Secondary outcomes included body composition, physical performance (the 10-m walk test and the timed up and go test [TUG]), and questionnaires about quality of life (QoL), physical activity, and depression. In addition, subgroup analysis was performed by dividing NMES and NMES + P groups into high- and low-intensity NMES groups. Results: Fifty-nine patients completed all the study outcomes. There was no difference in muscle strength (HGS and LMS) and muscle mass among groups. Gait speed improved in NMES and NMES + P groups. Subscale scores for QoL (kidney disease effect, role limitations due to physical or emotional problems, and overall health ratings) improved in the NMES + P group. In subgroup analysis, LMS and TUG improved only in the high-intensity NMES group. Conclusion: In this study, NMES and-/or- protein supplementation did not make a significant difference in HGS and LMS. However, NMES or NMES + P improved functional capacity and QoL. Furthermore, higher NMES was superior in improving LMS and functional capacity.
