Comparison of regional wall motion abnormalities in patients with occlusion myocardial infarction with and without ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)
- Author:
Alexander BRACEY
1
;
H. Pendell MEYERS
;
Caleb WATKINS
;
Gautam R. SHROFF
;
Daniel LEE
;
Adam SINGER J.
;
Stephen W. SMITH
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From: Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine 2025;12(4):342-349
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Objective:We aimed to determine whether there are similar rates of regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMAs) in patients with acute coronary occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI) with and without ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) on electrocardiogram (ECG).
Methods:We performed a retrospective review of a database of patients at high risk for acute coronary syndrome with previously established outcomes for the presence of OMI in order to compare rates of RWMA in patients presenting with STEMI(+) OMI versus STEMI(–) OMI. Furthermore, we compared how often the RWMA aligned with the anatomical territory observed on ECG.
Results:Among 808 patients, 551 underwent formal echocardiography, including 256 of 265 OMI patients and 295 of 543 patients with no occlusion. Of the 256 OMI patients that underwent formal echocardiography, only 105 (41.0%) met STEMI criteria. Among them, 94 of 105 (89.5%) STEMI(+) OMI patients had RWMAs compared to 124 of 151 (82.1%) STEMI(–) OMI patients (P=0.10; 95 confidence interval, –1.63% to 15.6%). Both groups had a greater prevalence of RWMA than the non-OMI group (45%). RWMA matched the anatomic territory predicted by ECG in 92.5% of STEMI(+) OMI, 82.3% of STEMI(–) OMI, and 2.9% of the no-occlusion cohort.
Conclusion:Location of RWMAs was well-correlated with ECG findings regardless of the presence or absence of STEMI criteria. A prospective study is warranted to determine the utility of echocardiography in the detection of STEMI(–) OMI.
