Detection Ability of Quality of Life Changes and Responsiveness of the KOQUSS-40 and the EORTC QLQ-C30/STO22 in Patients Who Underwent Gastrectomy: A Prospective Comparative Study
- Author:
Bang Wool EOM
1
;
Keun Won RYU
;
Ji Yeong AN
;
Yun-Suhk SUH
;
In CHO
;
Sung Geun KIM
;
Ji-Ho PARK
;
Hoon HUR
;
Hyung-Ho KIM
;
Sang-Hoon AHN
;
Sun-Hwi HWANG
;
Hong Man YOON
;
Ki Bum PARK
;
Hyoung-Il KIM
;
In-Gyu KWON
;
Han-Kwang YANG
;
Byoung-Jo SUH
;
Sang-Ho JEONG
;
Tae-Han KIM
;
Oh Kyoung KWON
;
Hye-Seong AHN
;
Ji Yeon PARK
;
Ki Young YOON
;
Myoung Won SON
;
Seong-Ho KONG
;
Young-Gil SON
;
Geum Jong SONG
;
Jong Hyuk YUN
;
Jung-Min BAE
;
Do Joong PARK
;
Sol LEE
;
Jun-Young YANG
;
Kyung Won SEO
;
You-Jin JANG
;
So Hyun KANG
;
Joongyub LEE
;
Hyuk-Joon LEE
;
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Cancer Research and Treatment 2026;58(1):221-231
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Purpose:The aim of this study is to compare the detection ability of quality of life (QoL) changes and responsiveness of the KOrean QUality of life in Stomach cancer patients Study group (KOQUSS)-40 and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ).
Materials and Methods:A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted to evaluate QoL changes after various gastrectomies between January 2021 and April 2022. Participants were instructed to complete the KOQUSS-40 and EORTC QLQ-C30/STO22 preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. QoL changes over time and QoL responsiveness were assessed for each questionnaire.
Results:Data from 491 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer at 22 institutions were analyzed. The summary scores of the KOQUSS-40 and EORTC QLQ-STO22 showed significant differences between the total and proximal gastrectomy groups (p=0.044 and p=0.038, respectively), but no difference was observed for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Dysphagia on the KOQUSS-40 was significantly different between the total and proximal gastrectomy groups (p=0.031); however, dysphagia on the EORTC QLQ-STO22 did not differ. The responsiveness of the KOQUSS-40 was similar to that of the EORTC QLQ in patients who experienced ≥ 10% body weight loss, but approximately 10% less in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy than the EORTC QLQ.
Conclusion:KOQUSS-40 has several advantages over EORTC QLQ-C30/STO22 when comparing QoL between the total and proximal gastrectomy groups. The findings provide information for researchers investigating the QoL of patients who have undergone curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
