Superior facet joint violation after lumbar pedicle screw placement: a scoping review of prevalence, biomechanics, and implications for adjacent segment disease
10.31616/asj.2025.0143
- Author:
Conor MCNAMEE
;
Jake Michael MCDONNELL
;
David KELLY
;
Harry MARLAND
;
Stacey DARWISH
;
Joseph Simon BUTLER
- Publication Type:Review Article
- From:Asian Spine Journal
2025;19(6):1032-1044
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Facet joint violation (FJV) is a known complication of pedicle screw fixation that may contribute to adjacent segment disease (ASD) by altering spinal biomechanics and increasing loading of the cranial facet joints. However, the prevalence, biomechanical effects, and longterm consequences of FJV remain unclear. A scoping review was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Clinical studies reporting the number of FJVs in relation to screws placed during lumbar fusion or assessing the frequency of ASD in patients with FJV were included. Biomechanical studies evaluating segmental kinematics and loading after FJV were also included. Data regarding study characteristics, surgical techniques, FJV rates, severity grading, and outcomes were extracted. Bayesian statistical models were applied for pooled prevalence estimates. Fifty studies met the inclusion criteria (39 clinical and 11 biomechanical studies). The prevalence of FJV varied, with robotic-assisted percutaneous placement associated with the lowest risk (4.79%; 95% credible interval [CrI], 3.88–5.79), and freehand percutaneous placement associated with the highest risk (19.45%; 95% CrI, 18.15–20.73). FJV rates were highest at L2 (14.5%; 95% CrI, 10.4%–19.0%) compared to lower levels. Biomechanical studies indicate that minor FJV may destabilize the superior segment by disrupting the facet capsule, while severe FJV involving full joint traversal might stabilize the segment due to the screw’s interaction with both articulating processes. Limited evidence suggests an association between FJV and ASD, though methodological limitations, selection bias, and reporting errors limit conclusions. FJV is common during lumbar fusion, especially with percutaneous screw placement. While biomechanical evidence suggests differing grades of FJV may variably alter segmental stability, its role in ASD development remains uncertain. Given its prevalence, biomechanical implications, and potential mitigation through navigation or robotics, determining whether FJV is a clinically significant driver of ASD is a key research imperative.
