Comparative analysis of surgical residency environments between Korea and Türkiye: a cross-sectional study
10.4174/astr.2025.109.3.151
- Author:
Hilal HWANG
1
;
Sun Min LEE
;
Shin-Young PARK
;
Jin Wook YI
;
Yun-Mee CHOE
;
Sun Keun CHOI
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, Inha University Hospital, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
- Publication Type:ORIGINAL ARTICLE
- From:Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2025;109(3):151-161
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Purpose:Although Korea’s medical care uses advanced technology, there are not enough doctors working in rural areas, and fewer doctors are working in challenging fields such as surgery. Medical care in Türkiye is very cost-effective for patients, but doctors have too many patients and too much work. This study compared the healthcare systems of the 2 countries and the gaps felt by surgeons.
Methods:A comparative analysis was conducted using a comprehensive literature review and a questionnaire involving medical professionals from various working positions in both countries.
Results:Doctors in both countries felt that there was a large medical gap between regions and reported that the number of doctors was small. Turkish doctors experience excessive patient overload, contributing to high stress and feelings of overwork. They also showed lower job satisfaction than in Korea. The common reasons for the low preference for general surgery residencies include intense training, excessive workload, and high risk in both countries.
Conclusion:This study identified the key challenges in medical and surgical training in Korea and Türkiye. In Korea, shortages can be addressed by reforms in general surgery residency, the development of a balanced residency selection system, and the provision of work opportunities for non-Korean professionals. In Türkiye, improving remuneration and alleviating unsafe work environments is urgent. Both countries should incentivize rural services to ensure balanced doctor distribution. Collaborative initiatives informed by these findings can enhance medical education and healthcare delivery in both countries.
