A Retrospective Comparative Study of Pedicle-Based Dynamic Stabilization Using a Flexible Rod System (Spine Gold) Versus Decompression Alone for Single-Level Central Stenosis With Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis
10.21182/jmisst.2025.02796
- Author:
Jung Hoon PARK
1
;
Jihoon HA
;
Cheul Woong PARK
Author Information
1. Department of Neurosurgery, Daejeon Woori Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:
Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique
2026;11(1):22-30
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Purpose:Spinal fusion, which is considered the standard treatment for segmental instability, carries an inherent risk of irreversible loss of spinal flexibility and the subsequent development of adjacent segment disease. Spinal dynamic stabilization has emerged as a motion-preserving alternative intended to mitigate these limitations. This study retrospectively compared clinical and radiological outcomes between the Spine Gold (SG) system and decompression alone in patients with single-level central stenosis accompanied by grade 1 spondylolisthesis.
Methods:A total of 262 patients who underwent surgery between January 2013 and May 2024 were included in the analysis (SG fixation, n=161; decompression alone, n=101). All decompression procedures were performed using the unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression technique. Clinical outcomes were evaluated based on reoperation rates, time to reoperation, preoperative and 1-month postoperative visual analogue scale scores for back pain and radicular pain, and 1-month postoperative MacNab criteria. Radiological outcomes, including static slippage and dynamic instability at both the index and proximal adjacent levels, were assessed using preoperative radiographs and radiographs obtained at final follow-up.
Results:Both treatment groups demonstrated significant postoperative improvement in pain outcomes. SG fixation was associated with significant reductions in static slippage and dynamic instability at the index level, along with a reduction in dynamic instability at the proximal adjacent level. In contrast, decompression alone resulted in postoperative increases in both static slippage and dynamic instability. The SG group also exhibited a significantly lower reoperation rate (10.6%) and a longer time to reoperation compared with the decompression-alone group (21.8%). All reoperations in the SG group occurred exclusively at the adjacent level, whereas reoperations in the decompression-alone group primarily involved recurrence or progression at the index level.
Conclusion:Dynamic stabilization using the SG system effectively stabilizes the index level while providing concomitant stabilization of the proximal segment. In carefully selected patients with single-level central stenosis and grade 1 spondylolisthesis, this approach may represent a viable alternative to fusion by offering improved long-term stability and lower reoperation rates, primarily through limiting progressive index-level instability compared with decompression alone.
