‘Jayulsingyeongsiljo’ Is Not a Recognized Medical Term: 2025 Survey of the Korean Society of Pain and Autonomic Disorders
- Author:
Kyomin CHOI
1
;
Jeeyoung OH
;
Jin-Woo PARK
;
Byeol-A YOON
;
Eun Bin CHO
;
Tae-Kyeong LEE
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Journal of the Korean Neurological Association 2026;44(1):37-46
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
Background:To investigate Korean neurologists' perceptions of the non-standard term ‘jayulsingyeongsiljo’ and their actual evaluation and management of such patients.
Methods:We performed an anonymous web-based cross-sectional survey of board-certified Korean neurologists by Korean Society of Pain and Autonomic Disorders between August 13 and September 10, 2025. A questionnaire sent by e-mail asked about demographics, experience with patients labeled with ‘jayulsingyeongsiljo,’ use and perceived usefulness of autonomic function tests, the impact of coronavirus disease 2019, and opinions on terminology and the role of neurologists.
Results:In total, 109 neurologists responded. Most reported that patients presenting for ‘jayulsingyeongsiljo’ were young or middle-aged adults and that their numbers had increased over the preceding 2 years. Referrals frequently originated from Korean medicine clinics and other non-neurology departments, often after stand-alone heart rate variability testing. Fatigue, orthostatic intolerance, palpitations, sweating abnormalities, gastrointestinal symptoms, and anxiety or insomnia were common, and autonomic testing was generally regarded as helpful. Eighty percent felt that the risks associated with ‘jayulsingyeongsiljo’ are overstated, and 95% preferred replacing the term with standardized expressions such as autonomic dysfunction.
Conclusions:Korean neurologists view ‘jayulsingyeongsiljo’ as an unrecognized and potentially misleading label and support society-led standardization of terminology and guidance to improve autonomic dysfunction care and resource use.
