Investigation on the clinical status of optical surface guided radiotherapy technology
10.3760/cma.j.cn113030-20240827-00331
- VernacularTitle:光学体表引导放射治疗技术临床现状的调研
- Author:
Yue WANG
1
;
Fengyu LU
1
;
Meng LIANG
1
;
Fukui HUAN
1
;
Jingjing LU
1
;
Chao LI
1
;
Shanshan XIA
1
;
Yifan LIAN
1
;
Tantan LI
1
Author Information
1. 国家癌症中心/国家肿瘤临床医学研究中心/中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院放疗科，北京 100021
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Radiotherapy, surface guided;
Survey;
Open face mask;
Motion management
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
2025;34(4):318-325
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the current status of clinical practice of optical surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) technology in China.Methods:A survey questionnaire was designed based on a similar investigation conducted by the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology in collaboration with the American Association of Physicists in Medicine on SGRT. The questionnaire covered aspects such as the installation, implementation, commissioning, quality assurance, clinical application, challenges, and cost considerations of SGRT systems. An online questionnaire was distributed to 49 institutions in China that have installed or are in the process of installing SGRT systems. Data were summarized and analyzed using Excel and SPSS 29 software.Results:Among the 49 institutions, 96% had at least one SGRT system. In terms of commissioning, quality assurance and implementation, it was mainly operated by physicists (94%) and technicians (82%), the cycle of test items for quality assurance was only achieved by the highest percentage of units with end-to-end test items for the annual inspection (50%). Eighty-six percent of the institutions used phantoms provided by suppliers, and 53% followed supplier recommendations or guidelines. For the installation of the first SGRT system, 37% of the institutions reported that initial staff training required more than 48 hours, while 73% found the training content easy to understand. Regarding the clinical application of SGRT technology, the majority of the institutions (53%) had used it for 1-3 years, with breast radiotherapy being the most commonly used treatment site. The primary scenario of SGRT application was intra-fraction motion monitoring / patient monitoring (69%). Furthermore, 47% of the institutions combined SGRT with open-face masks, and 71% used visual feedback devices for breath-hold or free-breathing gating. In terms of treatment thresholds, the median thresholds for monitoring and positioning were the same for breast, abdominopelvic (non- stereotactic body radiation therapy), and head-and-neck (non-brain stereotactic radiosurgery) treatments but varied for other sites.Conclusions:Although SGRT technology requires a relatively long initial training period, it is generally well accepted in terms of training and operation. Clinically, SGRT has been widely applied in breast radiotherapy, playing a crucial role in patient monitoring and intra-fraction motion management. However, most institutions have had limited clinical experience with the technology, highlighting the need for continuous technical supervision and improvement. The establishment of standardized protocols is necessary to ensure broader clinical adoption and long-term effectiveness.
