The diagnostic value of MRI in differentiating between tophus and giant cell tumors of the tendon sheath in the knee
10.3760/cma.j.cn112149-20240927-00592
- VernacularTitle:MRI在膝关节痛风结节与腱鞘巨细胞瘤鉴别诊断中的应用价值
- Author:
Haicheng BIAN
1
;
Na TIAN
;
Chunlin SONG
;
Xirui LI
;
Xiaonan YANG
;
Rongxin CHAI
;
Wenjian XU
;
Jiufa CUI
;
Dapeng HAO
Author Information
1. 青岛大学附属医院放射科，青岛 266003
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Gout;
Giant cell tumor of tendon sheath;
Magnetic resonance imaging;
Knee joint
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiology
2025;59(3):321-327
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the diagnostic value of MRI findings in differentiating between tophus and giant cell tumors of the tendon sheath (GCTTS) in the knee.Methods:The study was a case-control study. The clinical and MRI data of patients diagnosed with knee tophus or GCTTS was retrospectively analyzed at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from September 2018 to September 2024. The study included 23 cases of tophus and 22 cases of GCTTS. MRI sequences, including T 1WI, fat-suppressed T 2WI, and proton density weighted imaging, were evaluated. Parameters including lesion signal intensity and homogeneity, margin, maximum diameter, location (inside or outside the synovial cavity), ligament/tendon involvement, ligament/tendon parenchymal changes, adjacent bone erosion, bone marrow edema, synovial hyperplasia, joint effusion, and periarticular soft tissue swelling were recorded. Independent sample t-tests, χ2 tests, or Fisher exact tests were used to compare MRI findings between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictive factors. Results:Significant differences in terms of maximum diameter, location (inside or outside the synovial cavity), ligament/tendon involvement, ligament/tendon parenchymal changes, adjacent bone erosion, bone marrow edema, and periarticular soft tissue swelling between the two groups were found (all P<0.05). No significant differences for other parameters were observed (all P>0.05). Lesion location and ligament/tendon parenchymal involvement demonstrated the highest sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing the two diseases. The sensitivity and specificity values for lesion location were 0.78 and 0.95. The sensitivity and specificity values for ligament/tendon involvement were 0.78 and 1.00. Multivariate logistic regression identified lesion location (inside or outside the synovial cavity) as an independent predictor for differentiating tophus from GCTTS ( OR=31.48, 95% CI 1.58-625.69, P=0.024). Conclusion:The location of the lesion (inside or outside the synovial cavity) and involvement of ligament/tendon parenchyma are critical factors in differentiating knee tophus from GCTTS. Additionally, lesion location serves as an independent predictor for distinguishing between the two conditions.
