Levels of peripheral blood lung cancer biomarkers in apparently healthy individuals in Beijing and surrounding areas and establishment and validation of reference intervals
10.3760/cma.j.cn115355-20240926-00449
- VernacularTitle:北京及周边地区表观健康人群外周血肺癌标志物水平及参考区间的建立和验证
- Author:
Xinmiao LIU
1
;
Ping SUN
;
Mingyang HE
;
Yan KANG
;
Xiaoying LOU
;
Yue WU
;
Yulin SUN
;
Hongjun GAO
Author Information
1. 国家癌症中心 国家肿瘤临床医学研究中心 中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院检验科 分子肿瘤学国家重点实验室，北京 100021
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Lung neoplasms;
Tumor markers, biological;
Carcinoembryonic antigen;
Cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21-1;
Neuron specific enolase;
Progastrin-releasing pe
- From:
Cancer Research and Clinic
2025;37(6):412-421
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the features of levels of lung cancer biomarkers in peripheral blood of adults in Beijing and surrounding areas, and establish personalized reference intervals for these biomarkers.Methods:A cross sectional study was conducted. The lung cancer biomarker data, including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21-1 (CYFRA21-1), neuron specific enolase (NSE), progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP), and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag), collected from adults who underwent cancer prevention examinations at the Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from July 2021 to July 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The interquartile range method was used to eliminate outliers, and the P95 value was calculated. Upper limit of 5 lung cancer biomarkers in different gender and age groups were obtained by referring to the reference intervals of quantitative analytes in the clinical laboratory (WS/T 402-2024). By analyzing the data of 208 adults who underwent cancer prevention physical examinations at the same center in June 2021 and 140 patients with benign lung masses confirmed by surgical resection pathology from January 2016 to June 2022, the established reference intervals for biomarkers were validated. Results:Two thousand six hundred and twenty-six cases of apparently healthy physical examiners were included for constructing reference intervals, including 1 456 males (55.4%) and 1 170 females (44.6%); the age range was 20-88 years old. The serum levels [ M ( Q1, Q3)] of CEA, NSE, ProGRP, SCC-Ag and CYFRA21-1 in 2 626 cases were 1.63 (1.07, 2.43) ng/ml, 13.08 (11.44, 14.77) ng/ml, 34.93 (29.02, 42.19) pg/ml, 0.80 (0.60, 1.00) ng/ml and 1.96 (1.48, 2.63) ng/ml, respectively. The serum levels of CEA [1.88 (1.22, 2.76) ng/ml vs. 1.41 (0.93, 2.02) ng/ml], NSE [13.31 (11.87, 15.00) ng/ml vs. 12.69 (10.96, 14.53) ng/ml], SCC-Ag [0.9 (0.7, 1.1) ng/ml vs. 0.7 (0.6, 0.9) ng/ml], and CYFRA21-1 [2.02 (1.53, 2.71) ng/ml vs. 1.87 (1.40, 2.51) ng/ml] in males were higher than those in females, and ProGRP [34.00 (28.25, 41.55) pg/ml vs. 36.12 (29.97, 42.98) pg/ml] was lower than that in females, and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.001). There were statistically significant differences in serum CEA levels between the groups of ≤ 40 years old (458 cases), >40-50 years old (827 cases), >50-60 years old (783 cases), >60-70 years old (412 cases), and >70 years old (146 cases) in pairwise comparison (all P < 0.05). Except for the age groups of ≤ 40 years old and >40-50 years old and the age groups of >60-70 years old and >70 years old, there were statistically significant differences in serum NSE levels among the other age groups in pairwise comparison (all P < 0.05). There were statistically significant differences in serum ProGRP levels between the 5 age groups (all P < 0.05). There were statistically significant differences when comparing the serum SCC-Ag level in the >40-50 age group, >50-60 age group and >60-70 age group with that in the ≤40 age group and >70 age group, respectively (all P < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the other age groups in pairwise comparison (all P > 0.05). There were statistically significant differences in serum CYFRA21-1 levels between the 5 age groups (all P < 0.05). When gender and age were not distinguished, the P95 values of serum CEA, NSE, ProGRP, SCC-Ag and CYFRA21-1 levels were 4.44 ng/ml, 16.61 ng/ml, 57.65 pg/ml, 1.50 ng/ml, and 4.21 ng/ml, respectively. Considering gender and age, except for the >70 age group with no statistically significant difference in the P95 value of serum CEA level between males and females ( P > 0.05), the P95 value of serum CEA level in males was higher than that in females in all other age groups (all P < 0.001); the P95 values of serum CEA level in both males and females increased with age, but showed a decreasing trend in males over the age of 70. The P95 value of serum NSE level in males was higher than that in females in the age groups of ≤ 40 years and >40-50 years (both P < 0.05), while there was no statistically significant difference in the P95 value of serum NSE level between males and females in other age groups (all P > 0.05). The P95 values of serum NSE level in both males and females decreased firstly and increased later with age, reaching their highest levels at the age of >70. The P95 values of serum ProGRP level in females aged ≤ 40 and >50-60 were higher than those in males (both P < 0.05), while there was no statistically significant difference in the P95 value of serum ProGRP level between genders in other age groups (all P > 0.05); the P95 values of serum ProGRP level in both males and females increased with age. There was no statistically significant difference in the P95 value of serum SCC-Ag level between males and females in the ≤ 40 age group ( P > 0.05), while the P95 value of serum SCC-Ag level in males was higher than that in females in all other age groups (all P < 0.05). The P95 values of serum SCC-Ag level in males increased with age, while they were stable in females. There was no statistically significant difference in the P95 value of serum CYFRA21-1 level between males and females in the >60-70 age group ( P > 0.05), while the P95 value of serum CYFRA21-1 level in males was higher than those in females in all other age groups (all P < 0.05); the P95 values of serum CYFRA21-1 level in both males and females increased with age. Based on data from 2 626 apparently healthy physical examiners, reference intervals for the levels of 5 lung cancer biomarkers were constructed in different age groups of different genders. Validation was conducted on 208 physical examiners and 140 patients with benign lung lesions, and it was found that the compliance rate of using newly created reference intervals for different gender and age groups to interpret detection results was >90%, and the validation was passed. Conclusions:There are gender and age differences in the reference intervals of CEA, CYFRA21-1, NSE, ProGRP, and SCC-Ag in peripheral blood of adults in Beijing and surrounding areas. The constructed reference intervals of gender and age for biomarkers have been validated and shown good results, providing reference for optimizing the clinical application of lung cancer-related biomarkers.
