Efficacy of stellate ganglion block combined with cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia in chronic insomnia
10.3760/cma.j.cn431274-20241011-01539
- VernacularTitle:星状神经节阻滞联合睡眠认知行为疗法对慢性失眠症的疗效
- Author:
Yuanyuan CAO
1
;
Xiajuan HU
1
;
Xiaoliang WANG
1
;
Hongwei SHI
1
;
Ke DING
1
Author Information
1. 南京医科大学附属南京医院（南京市第一医院）麻醉疼痛与围术期医学科，南京 210006
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Insomnia;
Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia;
Stellate ganglion block
- From:
Journal of Chinese Physician
2025;27(8):1157-1161
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the effect of ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block (SGB) combined with cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) in the treatment of chronic insomnia.Methods:A total of 69 patients with chronic insomnia admitted to the Nanjing First Hospital from January 2023 to February 2024 were selected and randomly divided into the CBT-I alone group (simple group, 34 cases) and the SGB combined with CBT-I group (combined group, 35 cases) using a random number table. Both groups received treatment for 8 weeks. The simple group was treated with CBT-I twice a week, 1 hour each time. The combined group, on the basis of the simple group, received ultrasound-guided SGB with 4 ml of 1% lidocaine, which was performed once a day, alternately on the left and right sides, for 7 consecutive days each time, with a total of 14 injections in the 1st and 5th weeks. One week before treatment and 8 weeks after treatment, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and sleep diary were used to record patients′ subjective sleep quality; Actigraph was used to record objective sleep status; the Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) were used to assess patients′ emotional status. Adverse reactions such as hoarseness, pneumothorax, bleeding, and infection were recorded.Results:After 8 weeks of treatment, the effective rate was 76.5%(26/34) in the simple group and 94.3%(33/35) in the combined group, with a statistically significant difference (χ 2=8.433, P<0.05). Before treatment, there was no significant difference in PSQI scores between the two groups ( P>0.05). After 8 weeks of treatment, the PSQI scores of both groups were lower than those before treatment, and the PSQI score of the combined group was lower than that of the simple group, with a statistically significant difference ( P<0.05). Before treatment, there were no significant differences in sleep parameters from sleep diaries and Actigraph between the two groups (all P>0.05). Compared with before treatment, after treatment, the total sleep time and time in bed were prolonged, and sleep efficiency, the proportion of deep sleep, and the proportion of rapid eye movement sleep were increased in both groups; these indicators in the combined group were better than those in the simple group, with statistically significant differences (all P<0.05). Compared with before treatment, the sleep onset latency was shortened and the number of awakenings was reduced in both groups after treatment, and the combined group was better than the simple group, with statistically significant differences (all P<0.05). Before treatment, there were no significant differences in SAS and SDS scores between the two groups (all P>0.05). After treatment, the SAS and SDS scores of both groups were lower than those before treatment, and the SAS and SDS scores of the combined group were lower than those of the simple group, with statistically significant differences (all P<0.05). During treatment, 2 cases in the combined group developed hoarseness, which relieved spontaneously after 2 hours, and no other complications occurred. Conclusions:Ultrasound-guided SGB combined with CBT-I can significantly improve the nighttime sleep quality of patients with chronic insomnia.
