Comparison of arthroscopic Y-shaped suture suspension fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for tibial insertion avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament
10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20250328-00135
- VernacularTitle:关节镜下"Y"形缝合悬吊固定术与切开复位内固定治疗后交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折的疗效比较
- Author:
Zijiang YANG
1
;
Tao HE
;
Huai SHAO
;
Ming ZOU
;
Yun GU
;
Min YU
Author Information
1. 南华大学附属长沙市中心医院运动医学科，长沙 410000
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Posterior cruciate ligament;
Tibial fractures;
Arthroscopy;
Open reduction;
Fracture fixation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
2025;27(8):674-680
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic Y-shaped suture suspension fixation and those of open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of tibial insertion avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL).Methods:A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the clinical data from the 23 patients with PCL tibial avulsion fracture who had been admitted to Department of Sports Medicine, The Affiliated Changsha Central Hospital, University of South China, from May 2018 to May 2024. There were 15 males and 8 females with an age of (39.0±15.6) years. By the Meyers-McKeever classification, there were 20 cases of type Ⅱ and 3 cases of type Ⅲ. All patients were divided into 2 groups based on their different surgical schemes: an arthroscopic group of 11 cases treated with Y-shaped suture suspension fixation under arthroscopy and an open group of 12 cases treated with open reduction and internal fixation. The surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, Lysholm knee function scores, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective scores at 1 month after surgery and the last follow-up were recorded and compared between the 2 groups.Results:There was no statistically significant difference in the preoperative general information between the 2 groups, indicating comparability ( P>0.05). The 23 patients were followed up for (13.7±3.8) months after surgery. None of the patients experienced complications like incision infection, neurovascular damage, nonunion or delayed union of fracture. In the arthroscopic group, the surgical time was (97.1±11.1) min, significantly shorter than that in the open group [(64.7±9.0) min], and the intraoperative blood loss (14.9±6.6) mL, significantly less than that in the open group [(29.4±13.2) mL] ( P<0.05). At 1 month after surgery, the VAS pain score, Lysholm knee function score, and IKDC subjective score in the arthroscopic group were, respectively, 3.0 (2.0, 3.0) points, (72.0±4.8) points, and (67.3±2.9) points, all significantly better than those in the open group [5.0 (4.0, 5.0) points, (66.9±4.0) points, and (63.1±2.4) points] ( P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the VAS pain score, Lysholm knee function score, or IKDC subjective score at the last follow-up between the 2 groups ( P>0.05). Conclusions:Both arthroscopic Y-shaped suture suspension fixation and open reduction and internal fixation can achieve satisfactory treatment outcomes for PCL tibial avulsion fractures. The latter shows an advantage in shorter surgical time, but the former advantages in less bleeding volume and better early efficacy.
