Lateral placement versus median placement of the intramedullary nail guide pin in the closed reduction of metaphyseal fracture of the distal tibia
10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20241227-00511
- VernacularTitle:偏外放置与居中放置髓内钉导针在闭合复位治疗胫骨远侧干骺端骨折中的疗效比较
- Author:
Yangkai XU
1
;
Yan ZHUANG
;
Mingwei ZHANG
;
Wei ZHENG
;
Yanbin LIN
Author Information
1. 福州市第二总医院创伤骨科，福州 350007
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Tibia;
Fracture fixation, internal;
Surgical procedures, minimally invasive;
Metaphyseal fracture of the distal tibia
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
2025;27(8):665-673
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the efficacy of lateral placement of the intramedullary nail guide pin versus that of median placement of the intramedullary nail guide pin in the closed reduction of metaphyseal fracture of the distal tibia.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 48 patients with metaphyseal fracture of the distal tibia who had been admitted to Department of Trauma Orthopaedics, The Second General Hospital of Fuzhou from May 2019 to July 2023. There were 37 males and 11 females, aged (46.0±12.4) years. According to the AO classification, 37 patients were classified as type A1, and 11 ones as type A2. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the distal positioning of the intramedullary nail guide pins during operation. In the lateral placement group of 26 patients, the distal positioning of the guide pins was located at 1/3 lateral to the articular surface of the distal tibia. In the median placement group of 22 patients, the distal positioning of the guide pins was located at the midpoint of the articular surface of the distal tibia. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, fracture healing time and fracture reduction were recorded and compared between the 2 groups. Moreover, the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, and range of motion of the affected ankle were compared between the 2 groups, as well as within the 2 groups. The complications were compared between the 2 groups at the last follow-up.Results:There were no significant differences in the demographic data between the 2 groups, indicating comparability ( P>0.05). All patients were followed up for (19.6±4.4) months. The operation time [(81.7±17.3) min], intraoperative blood loss [(78.4±12.2) mL], hospital stay [(5.7±2.1) d] and fracture healing time [(4.3±1.1) months] in the lateral placement group were significantly less than those in the median placement group [(103.0±13.4) min, (111.4±11.7) ml, (8.6±3.5) d, and (6.1±1.3) months] ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the VAS pain score between the 2 groups before operation or at the last follow-up ( P>0.05). At the last follow-up, the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score [(93.6±1.6) points], ankle dorsiflexion (17.9°±1.6°) and plantar flexion (41.9°±1.9°) in the lateral placement group were significantly better than those in the median placement group [(87.8±3.2) points, 15.1°±1.2°, and 38.5°±2.7°] ( P<0.05). In both groups, significant improvements were achieved at the last follow-up in VAS pain score, the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score, ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexion compared with the preoperative period ( P<0.05). The incidence of fracture angulation deformity in the lateral placement group (11.5%, 3/26) was lower than that in the median placement group (31.8%, 7/22) ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the lateral placement group (3.8%, 1/26) and the central placement group (18.2%, 4/22) ( P>0.05). Conclusion:In the closed reduction of metaphyseal fracture of the distal tibia, compared with median placement of the intramedullary nail guide pin, lateral placement of the intramedullary nail guide pin assisted with a Kirschner wire demonstrates advantages of more rapid and effective closed reduction of the fracture, shortened operation time, reduced intraoperative blood loss and promoted postoperative rehabilitation.
