Integrated multi-parameter monitoring for optimizing low-molecular-weight heparin treatment in intensive care unit patients: a clinical value assessment
10.3760/cma.j.cn114452-20250214-00083
- VernacularTitle:多指标联合监测重症监护病房患者低分子肝素治疗的应用价值
- Author:
Qin LI
1
;
Liqin LING
;
Xiaomei LI
;
Chaonan LIU
;
Xunbei HUANG
;
Shuang WANG
;
Zhiyu YU
;
Jing ZHOU
Author Information
1. 四川大学华西医院实验医学科，成都610041
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Intensive care unit;
Low-molecular-weight heparin;
Anti-Ⅹa activity;
Thrombin-antithrombin complex;
Plasmin -antiplasmin complex
- From:
Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine
2025;48(8):1008-1014
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the clinical value of multi-parameter combined monitoring in guiding low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) therapy for intensive care unit (ICU) patients.Methods:A retrospective case-control study was conducted. A total of 381 patients who received LMWH therapy with anti-Ⅹa activity monitoring in the ICU of West China Hospital, Sichuan University between January 31st, 2022, and November 30th, 2023, were enrolled in this study. The cohort comprised 264 males and 117 females, with the age of 58 (48, 71) years old. Clinical data and relevant laboratory parameters were collected, including anti-Ⅹa activity, antithrombin activity (AT), thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), plasmin-antiplasmin complex (PIC), conventional coagulation parameters such as activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and indicators of hepatic/renal impairment such as alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and creatinine( CREA). Patients were stratified into three groups based on thrombotic event: thrombosis-controlled, progressive thrombosis, and bleeding group. Single-factor and adjusted multifactorial Logistic regression analysis were used to identify independent predictors of anti-xa activity levels.Results:Among 381 patients, thrombosis was controlled in 213 (55.9%) patients, progressed in 81 (21.3%) patients , and bleeding events occurred in 87 (22.8%) patients. The patients whose anti-Ⅹa activity levels lay entirely within the target range(0.2-0.4 IU/ml): Only 35 (16.4%) cases in the thrombosis-controlled group, 16 (19.7%) cases in the progressive thrombosis group, and 16 (18.4%) in the bleeding group. No significant differences in anti-Ⅹ a levels activity among the three groups ( H=1.678, P=0.432). Both single-factor and adjusted multifactorial Logistic regression identified low AT activity as an independent risk factor for failure to achieve target anti-Ⅹ a activity levels (AT nadir, OR=1.031,95% CI 1.016-1.046, P<0.05). Compared with the progressive thrombosis and bleedinggroup, the thrombosis-controlled group exhibited significantly higher proportion of TAT values below the cut-off value ( H=8.519, P=0.014), and a higher proportion of TAT/PIC ratios below the cut-off ( H=15.56, P<0.001). Patients with bleeding demonstrated significantly lower AT activity ( H=14.968, P=0.001), prolonged APTT ( H=6.815, P=0.033), higher ALT ( H=13.774, P=0.001), and higher CREA ( H=14.068, P=0.001) compared with the thrombosis-controlled or progressive thrombosis group. Conclusion:Laboratory monitoring is required for low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) therapy in ICU patients. While anti-Ⅹa activity reflects the anticoagulant effect of LMWH, the utility of anti-Ⅹ a activity for predicting thrombotic or hemorrhagic risks in LMWH treated ICU patients is limited. Reductions in TAT levels and TAT/PIC ratios are associated with a lower risk of thrombotic progression. Furthermore, abnormalities in conventional coagulation tests and standard hepatic/renal function parameters occur more frequently in patients experiencing hemorrhagic events.
