Research on the performance evaluation system for clinical medicine advantageous disciplines in affiliated hospitals of Xinjiang universities
10.3760/cma.j.cn113565-20241029-00283
- VernacularTitle:新疆高校附属医院临床医学优势学科绩效评价体系研究
- Author:
Yuge LI
1
;
Zengliang WANG
1
;
Mijiti GULIRENA
1
;
Xiaojie ZHENG
1
;
Hongwei PU
1
Author Information
1. 新疆医科大学第一附属医院，乌鲁木齐 830054
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Delphi method;
Analytic hierarchy process;
Clinical medicine;
Discipline construction;
Indicator system
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management
2025;38(3):191-196
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:The level of discipline construction is an important indicator of a hospital′s comprehensive strength and core competitiveness.Establishing a scientific, reasonable, and effective performance evaluation system for the clinical medicine advantageous disciplines is of particular significance for university affiliated hospitals to strengthen discipline construction, improve governance systems, and promote high-quality development of hospitals.Methods:The Delphi method was used to determine the reliability of the indicator system by measuring the positivity coefficient, authority level, coefficient of variation, and coordination coefficient.Using Analytic Hierarchy Process, judgment matrix was established to determine the corresponding weights of elements, and calculate the total weight coefficients of each indicator, as well the consistency of the judgment matrix was checked.Results:The Cronbach′s coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.945, indicating high reliability.The effective recovery rates of the two rounds of expert consultation were 90.0%and 94.7%.Two rounds′ expert authority coefficients were 0.743 and 0.720.And the Kendall harmony coefficient was 0.196~0.731. The differences mentioned above were statistically significant(all P<0.05).Through two rounds consultation, a performance evaluation system for the clinical medicine advantageous disciplines was constructed, including 8 primary indicators and 24 secondary indicators.The weight coefficients of the primary indicators were 0.126, 0.208, 0.091, 0.162, 0.178, 0.118, 0.068, 0.049, and the total weight coefficients of each indicator were calculated, which showed good logical reliability. Conclusions:The performance evaluation system for the clinical medicine advantageous disciplines has strong scientific validity.It can provide evaluation tools for promoting the rational allocation and efficient utilization of hospital resources.
