Clinical application of multiparametric flow cytometry immunophenotyping for rapid differential diagnosis of APL and APL-like NPM1mutAML
10.3760/cma.j.cn114452-20240515-00253
- VernacularTitle:多参数流式细胞术免疫分型快速鉴别诊断APL和APL样NPM1mutAML的临床应用
- Author:
Yini YU
1
;
Baoguo CHEN
1
;
Jun GAN
1
;
Zhiying SHEN
1
;
Rui ZHENG
1
Author Information
1. 温州医科大学附属台州医院中心实验室，临海 317000
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Flow cytometry;
Immunophenotyping;
Acute promyelocytic leukemia
- From:
Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine
2025;48(3):364-370
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the immunophenotypic differences between acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) and APL-like NPM1 mutant acute myeloid leukemia (NPM1mutAML) using flow cytometry, and to investigate early diagnostic markers for differentiating APL from NPM1mutAML.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted on 72 cases of APL diagnosed at Taizhou Hospital, affiliated with Wenzhou Medical University, from February 2nd, 2018 to December 16th, 2023, including 42 male and 30 female patients with a median age of 42 (32, 57) years old. Based on morphology, 51 cases were classified as the coarse-granular type and 21 cases as the fine-granular type. Additionally, 45 cases of NPM1mutAML, comprising 20 male and 25 female patients with a median age of 58 (47, 65) years old, were included. Of these, 12 cases were classified as the coarse-granular type and 33 as the fine-granular type. Immunophenotypic analysis was performed using multiparameter flow cytometry, and all patients underwent cytogenetic analysis for chromosome karyotyping. FISH analysis was used for detecting the PML-RARα fusion gene in APL cases, and sequencing was used for identifying NPM1 mutations in NPM1mutAML patients. The antigen expression parameters (expression rate, median fluorescence intensity [MdFI], and coefficient of variation [ CV]) were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA). The antigen expression rates were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and the positive rates of antigens were compared using the Chi-square test. Sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis by the some antigens were evaluated using ROC curve analysis. Results:The immunophenotypic analysis revealed that the expression rates of CD123, CD64, CD13, and CD9 were significantly higher in APL compared to NPM1mutAML ( Z values of-6.72, -6.29, -5.63, -7.67, P<0.01). In the coarse-granular type, the expression rates of CD123 and CD9 in APL were also significantly higher than those in NPM1mutAML ( P<0.01). In the fine-granular type, the expression levels of CD123, CD13, CD64, and CD9 were significantly higher in APL than in NPM1mutAML ( P<0.01). ROC curve analysis showed that in the fine-granular type, the areas under the curve (AUC) for CD64, CD13, CD123, and CD9 in diagnosing APL and NPM1mutAML were 0.96, 0.89, 0.86, and 0.89, respectively ( P<0.01). In the coarse-granular type, the AUC for CD64 and CD13 were 0.49 and 0.51 ( P>0.05), while the AUC for CD123 and CD9 were 0.96 and 0.96 ( P<0.01). Principal component analysis (PCA) of antigen expression (expression rate, MdFI, CV) showed complete separation of the APL and NPM1mutAML groups. Conclusion:APL and APL-like NPM1mutAML patients exhibit distinct antigen expression profiles. Specifically, a combined detection of CD64, CD13, CD123, and CD9 can help to rapidly differentiate APL from APL-like NPM1mutAML at initial diagnosis.
