Evaluation of solution-focused nursing model in perioperative care for patients with pelvic fractures
10.3760/cma.j.cn501098-20241230-00730
- VernacularTitle:焦点解决护理模式在骨盆骨折患者围术期的应用效果评价
- Author:
Xingling XIAO
1
;
Hongting ZHENG
1
;
Haibo XIANG
1
;
Xinyan DUAN
1
;
Meiru ZHANG
1
;
Xiancai ZENG
1
Author Information
1. 南方医科大学第三附属医院骨科医学中心创伤骨科，广州 510630
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Pelvis;
Fractures, bone;
Nursing care;
Degree of satisfaction
- From:
Chinese Journal of Trauma
2025;41(7):682-687
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the application effects of the solution-focused nursing model (SFNM) and conventional care in the perioperative care for patients with pelvic fractures.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 62 patients with pelvic fractures admitted to the Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University between February 2023 and July 2023, including 41 males and 21 females, aged 26-63 years [(44.1±15.7)years]. All the patients underwent open or closed reduction and internal fixation. According to different perioperative nursing intervention, 31 patients were treated with conventional care (conventional care group) and 31 with SFNM intervention based on conventional care (SFNM group). A comparative analysis was conducted between the two groups regarding general self-efficacy scale (GSES) score, Barthel index (BI) score, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) score, and self-rating depression scale (SDS) score preoperatively, at discharge, and at 6 months postoperatively. The excellent-to-good rate of Majeed pelvic function score and nursing satisfaction at the final follow-up and perioperative complication incidence were compared between the two group.Results:All the patients were followed up for 12-15 months [(13.5±0.9)months]. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in GSES, BI, SAS or SDS scores ( P>0.05). At discharge, the GSES and BI scores in the SFNM group were (29.0±3.8)points and (37.4±8.7)points, significantly higher than (20.9±3.0)points and (31.5±12.1)points in the conventional care group ( P<0.05); the SAS and SDS scores were (41.9±5.1)points and (40.6±4.9)points in the SFNM group, significantly lower than (53.7±9.1)points and (42.9±7.5)points in the conventional care group ( P<0.01). At 6 months postoperatively, the SFNM group achieved GSES and BI scores of (34.0±4.0)points and (40.3±9.0)points, significantly higher than (25.2±3.7)points and (35.7±10.5)points in the conventional care group ( P<0.05); the SAS and SDS scores were (45.8±5.0)points and (38.2±3.0)points in the SFNM group, significantly lower than (50.0±8.5)points and (40.7±6.5)points in the conventional care group ( P<0.01). At the final follow-up, the excellent-to-good rate of Majeed pelvic function score was 90% (28/31) in the SFNM group and 87% (27/31) in the conventional care group ( P>0.05). At the final follow-up, nursing satisfaction rate was 100% (31/31) in the SFNM group, significantly higher than 77% (24/31) in the conventional care group ( P<0.05). The perioperative complication rate was 6% (2/31) in the SFNM group, significantly lower than 38% (12/31) in the conventional care group ( P<0.05). Conclusion:Compared with conventional care, perioperative intervention with SFNM for patients with pelvic fractures can enhance self-efficacy and daily living self-care ability, reduce negative emotions such as anxiety and depression, improve nursing satisfaction, and lower the incidence of complications, making it worthy of clinical promotion.
