CGA-guided multidisciplinary intervention for frail non-dialysis elderly patients with chronic kidney disease
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-9026.2025.04.014
- VernacularTitle:基于老年综合评估的老年慢性肾脏病非透析衰弱患者的多学科干预
- Author:
Yu'er LIANG
1
;
Jing CHANG
;
Yun GAO
;
Yanfei WANG
;
Qianmei SUN
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院肾内科，北京 100020
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Multidisciplinary interventions;
Chronic kidney disease;
Frailty;
Non-dialysis;
Comprehensive geriatric assessment
- From:
Chinese Journal of Geriatrics
2025;44(4):490-497
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the effects of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment(CGA)-guided multidisciplinary interventions on frail non-dialysis elderly patients with chronic kidney disease, while also assessing the influence of different levels of frailty.Methods:This study is a randomized controlled trial conducted between 2020 and 2021, involving 230 frail, non-dialysis elderly patients with chronic kidney disease stages 3-5, treated at our hospital.Participants were randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a control group using a random number table method, with 115 patients in each group.The intervention group received multidisciplinary treatment over a period of 12 months, while the control group received standard care.We compared Fried frailty scores, re-hospitalization rates, and all-cause mortality between the two groups, and documented changes in CGA both before treatment and 12 months after treatment.Results:After 12 months of treatment, the Fried frail phenotype score was significantly lower in the intervention group(2.7±1.2)compared to the control group(3.6±1.8, t=97.47, P<0.01).Additionally, grip strength in the intervention group was higher(20.6±8.5 kg)than in the control group(13.5±8.1 kg, t=6.57, P<0.01).The scores for the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form(MNA-SF)(10.7±4.0 vs.9.1±4.2, t=29.03, P<0.01), Mini-Mental State Examination Scale(MMSE)(24.3±8.6 vs.19.3±9.6, t=96.35, P<0.01), and Short Physical Performance Battery(SPPB)(6.8±3.2 vs.3.5±2.9, t=71.97, P<0.01)were also significantly higher in the intervention group.Furthermore, the Activity of Daily Living(ADL)score was greater in the intervention group(5.4±1.6)than in the control group(3.9±1.6, t=5.75, P<0.01), as was weight(67.2±11.2 kg vs.64.0±11.8 kg, t=2.02, P=0.045).The frailty reversal rate was significantly higher in the intervention group(32.2% vs.8.0%, χ2=21.4, P<0.01), and the all-cause mortality rate was lower in this group(11.3% vs.22.6%, χ2=5.22, P=0.022).However, there were no significant differences observed in the Geriatric Depression Scale(GDS)(6.3±3.7 vs.6.0±4.3, t=24.29, P>0.05), estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate(eGFR)[(44.1±19.2)ml·(min·1.73m 2) -1vs.(39.8±19.0)ml·(min·1.73m 2) -1, t=1.76, P>0.05], Instrumental Activity of Daily Living(IADL)(5.2±2.2 vs.4.6±2.2, t=1.49, P>0.05), and the rate of readmission(25.2% vs.36.5%, χ2=3.44, P>0.05). Conclusions:Multidisciplinary interventions derived from a comprehensive geriatric assessment can ameliorate or even reverse frailty, reduce all-cause mortality, and enhance the prognosis of frail elderly patients with chronic kidney disease stages 3 to 5 who are not undergoing dialysis.
