Comparative efficacy of whole blood transfusion versus component therapy in the resuscitation of patients with traumatic shock: a Meta-analysis
10.3760/cma.j.cn501098-20250207-00076
- VernacularTitle:全血复苏与成分疗法在创伤性休克患者复苏中应用效果比较的Meta分析
- Author:
Yingkai XU
1
;
Zihan YUAN
;
Junying LI
;
Wanbing LIU
;
Lei LIU
Author Information
1. 武汉科技大学医学部医学院，武汉 430065
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Shock, hemorrhagic;
Exchange transfusion, whole blood;
Blood component transfusion;
Resuscitation;
Meta-analysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Trauma
2025;41(6):594-604
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the efficacy of whole blood (WB) versus component therapy (COMP) in the resuscitation of patients with traumatic shock.Methods:A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed and Embase databases for English literature published from January 2006 to December 2023. Studies on the comparative efficacy of WB versus COMP in resuscitation of patients with traumatic shock were all included. Patients were categorized according to the initial transfusion strategies into WB group and COMP group. Primary outcome indicators were extracted and subjected to meta-analysis, including transfusion requirements after admission (4-hour red blood cell requirement, 4-hour plasma requirement, 4-hour total transfusion volume, 24-hour red blood cell requirement, 24-hour plasma requirement, and 24-hour total transfusion volume), length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, and mortality rates (early mortality, 24-hour mortality, late mortality, and in-hospital mortality, and 24-hour mortality with multiple variables adjusted).Results:Twenty-seven studies involving 15 176 patients (4 692 patients in WB group and 10 484 in COMP group) were included. Meta-analysis results indicated that the 4-hour red blood cell requirement (SMD=-0.44, 95% CI -0.69, -0.19, P<0.01), 4-hour plasma requirement (SMD=-0.25, 95% CI -0.50, -0.01, P<0.05), 24-hour red blood cell requirement (SMD=-0.22, 95% CI -0.36, -0.09, P<0.01), and 24-hour mortality with multiple variables adjusted ( OR=0.78, 95% CI 0.68, 0.91, P<0.05) were significantly reduced in WB group. No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding 4-hour total transfusion volume, 24-hour plasma requirement, 24-hour total transfusion volume, length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, early mortality, 24-hour mortality, late mortality, and total in-hospital mortality ( P>0.05). Conclusions:WB demonstrates certain advantages over COMP in the resuscitation of patients with traumatic shock by reducing 4-hour red blood cell requirement, 4-hour plasma requirement, 24-hour red blood cell requirement, and 24-hour mortality with multiple variables adjusted. However, WB and COMP demonstrate comparable effectiveness in reducing 4-hour total transfusion volume, 24-hour plasma requirement, 24-hour total transfusion volume, early mortality rate, 24-hour mortality rate, late mortality rate, and in-hospital mortality.
