Construction of a competency evaluation index system for clinical teachers in teaching hospitals
10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20240316-01909
- VernacularTitle:教学医院临床教师胜任力评价指标体系的构建
- Author:
Yuan ZHANG
1
;
Zhihui ZOU
;
Manjie ZHANG
;
Zhiquan LIN
;
Chuhong YU
Author Information
1. 江门市中心医院科教科，江门 529030
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Clinical teacher;
Teaching hospital;
Competency;
Evaluation index;
Delphi method
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
2025;24(2):192-198
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To construct a scientific and reliable clinical teacher competency evaluation index system, and provide a reference for strengthening the construction of clinical teachers in teaching hospitals.Methods:Based on literature research and group discussion, the initial expert consultation questionnaire was constructed. Two rounds of expert consultation were conducted using the Delphi method to form the competency evaluation index system for clinical teachers in teaching hospitals. A hierarchy analysis was conducted using Python to calculate the weights of indicators.Results:The positive coefficients of the two rounds of expert consultation were 100.00% and 95.24%, respectively, and the expert authority coefficients were 0.843 and 0.862, respectively. The Kendall's coefficients of concordance for the first-, second-, and third-level indicators in the first round of expert consultation were 0.207, 0.152, and 0.191 ( P<0.001), respectively, and these coefficients in the second round of expert consultation were 0.271, 0.176, and 0.252 ( P<0.001), respectively. The final evaluation index system included 7 first-level indicators, 15 second-level indicators, and 43 third-level indicators. The first-level indicators included professional quality, professional knowledge and skills, medical education knowledge, teaching ability, communication and cooperation, teaching motivation, and career development, and their weights were 0.147, 0.149, 0.142, 0.147, 0.146, 0.134, and 0.136, respectively. Conclusions:The evaluation index system is comprehensive, scientific, and reliable. It can provide a reference for clinical teacher selection, evaluation, and training in teaching hospitals.
