Decision aids for lung cancer screening: a scoping review
10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20250206-00511
- VernacularTitle:肺癌筛查决策辅助工具的范围综述
- Author:
Lingjia CUI
1
;
Feng LIU
;
Huiying YUE
;
Yuting HAO
;
Tingyuan HAN
;
Yan LIN
;
Yanli XIU
;
Ying LIN
Author Information
1. 牡丹江医科大学护理学院，牡丹江 157011
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Review;
Lung cancer;
Screening;
Decision aid;
Shared decision-making;
Decisional conflict
- From:
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
2025;31(24):3355-3360
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To conduct a scoping review of studies on decision aids for lung cancer screening and provide a reference for the development of such tools in China.Methods:In accordance with the methodology of scoping reviews, a comprehensive search was performed across PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, China Biology Medicine disc, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, and VIP from inception to November 1, 2024. The included literature was summarized and analyzed.Results:A total of 18 studies were included. The decision aids for lung cancer screening mainly addressed elements such as information support and guidance, analysis of pros and cons related to screening decisions, clarification of values and preferences, and communication support during decision-making. Outcome indicators included cognitive and behavioral aspects, values and preferences, decision outcomes, acceptability and feasibility of the tools. The application effects showed improvements in participants' knowledge about lung cancer screening, screening behaviors, reduced decisional conflict and regret, and increased satisfaction with decision-making. Participants showed a high level of acceptance of these tools.Conclusions:Current research on lung cancer screening decision aids is predominantly conducted in other countries and demonstrates positive effects. In the future, China can draw on these experiences to develop decision aids suitable for the Chinese population, with the aim of reducing decisional conflict and improving decision quality.
