Clinical application of six different lipoprotein(a)immunoassays in evaluating atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
10.13602/j.cnki.jcls.2025.04.03
- VernacularTitle:6种脂蛋白(a)免疫测定法在评价动脉粥样硬化心血管疾病中的临床应用
- Author:
Xu ZHU
1
;
Yuanhong ZHONG
;
Jian WANG
;
Xinqi CHENG
Author Information
1. 中国医学科学院北京协和医院检验科,北京 100730
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
lipoprotein(a);
immunoassay;
methodology evaluation;
atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
- From:
Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science
2025;43(4):253-260
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Abastract:Objective To validate the performance of six different lipoprotein(a)[Lp(a)]immunoassay detection systems,compare the correlation and consistency of the measurement results of different detection systems,and explore their clinical application in the e-valuation of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease(AsCVD).Methods A total of 150 AsCVD patients attending Peking Union Medi-cal College Hospital were retrospectively selected as the subjects of study group,and 50 individuals of physical examination during the same period were selected as healthy control group.Lp(a)levels were measured in 200 serum samples using six immunoassay detection systems,including two Lp(a)particle concentration assays in nmol/L(Roche and Mindray Ⅱ),and four Lp(a)mass concentration assays in mg/L(Mindray,MedicalSystem,BSBE,and Sekisui).All assays'precisions were evaluated.The results of each assay sys-tem were compared with the mean value of all the Lp(a)assays.Passing-Bablok regression analysis and Bland-Altman bias plots were used to assess the accuracy of assays,and the consistency between different systems was analyzed using the concordance correlation co-efficient(CCC).In addition,the consistencies of different assays in assessing AsCVD in clinical setting were compared using weighted Kappa statistical method,and the positive rates of Lp(a)particle concentration and mass concentration,as well as the overestimation and underestimation of mass concentration were also assessed for both the study group and the healthy control group.Results The pre-cision of the six Lp(a)assays ranged from 0.6％to 2.1％.Passing-Bablok regression analysis showed that the Spearman correlation co-efficients of the regression equations were all greater than 0.970,and the intercepts and slopes of the regression lines were-43.311 to 39.456 and 0.547 to 5.500,respectively.The Bland-Altman bias plots showed that the percent bias of the six assays compared to the mean value of Lp(a)determination was in the range of-25.939％to 40.205％.The results of the Lp(a)mass concentration detection system showed a positive deviation in Mindray and MedicalSystem,and a negative deviation in BSBE and Sekisui.Compared with the mean value of Lp(a),the results of consistency analysis showed that Roche and Mindray Ⅱ had excellent consistency(CCC:0.992 to 0.993).Mindray,MedicalSystem and BSBE had good consistency(CCC:0.950 to 0.986),and Sekisui showed moderate consistency(CCC:0.935).In descending order,the positivity rates of Lp(a)in the study groups were:MedicalSystem＞BSBE＞Mindray＞Roche=Mindray Ⅱ＞Sekisui.The overall concordances of Mindray,MedicalSystem,BSBE and Sekisui compared to Lp(a)particle concentration assay in different groups were 97.33％,93.33％,97.33％and 98.00％with Kappa values of 0.910,0.798,0.912 and 0.927,respec-tively.Conclusion The two assays for Lp(a)particle concentration have fine correlation and consistency,but there were significant differences between the four assays for Lp(a)mass concentration.Compared to the Lp(a)particle concentration assays,the four assay for Lp(a)mass concentration resulted in overestimation or underestimation of Lp(a)levels in the assessment of AsCVD.Accurate de-termination of Lp(a)concentration should be of great importance in accurately assessing the overall risk of AsCVD in patients.
