Propensity score matching analysis of the efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin combined with insulin and double filtration plasmapheresis in treating patients with hypertriglyceridemic acute pancreatitis
10.3760/cma.j.cn115667-20241115-00190
- VernacularTitle:低分子肝素联合胰岛素与双重血浆置换对高三酰甘油血症性急性胰腺炎患者疗效的倾向性评分匹配分析
- Author:
Jing DAI
1
;
Liulan QIAN
;
Wenbin MAO
;
Xiaofeng YE
;
Minghui ZHU
;
Min LIN
Author Information
1. 南京医科大学第三附属医院（常州市第二人民医院）消化内科，常州 213000
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Hypertriglyceridemic acute pancreatitis;
Double filtration plasmapheresis;
Propensity score matching;
Lipid profile;
Prognosis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Pancreatology
2025;25(4):268-274
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To analyze the effects of low-molecular-weight heparin combined with insulin (LMWH+INS) and double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) on lipid profiles and clinical outcomes in patients with hypertriglyceridemic acute pancreatitis (HTG-AP) based on propensity score matching.Methods:The clinical data of 126 patients with HTG-AP from October 2022 to February 2024 in The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Traditional Chinese Medicine University and Changzhou First People's Hospital were retrospectively included. Patients were divided into LMWH+INS group ( n=87) and DFPP group ( n=39) according to the treatment. Propensity score matching was applied at a 1∶1 ratio. The repeated measures analysis of variance was conducted to assess dynamic changes of blood lipids within the 5 days of admission between the LMWH+INS and DFPP groups after matching. Clinical symptoms and outcomes were compared between the two matched groups following matching. Results:29 patients were included in both LMWH+INS group and DFPP group after propensity score matching. No statistically significant differences were observed in triglycerides (TG), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ) score, or bedside index for the severity of acute pancreatitis (BISAP) between the two groups (all P value >0.05), indicating comparability. Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed that TG and TC levels in the DFPP group were significantly lower than those in the LMWH+INS group at 2-5 days after admission [TG 2 d: (5.26±2.59) mmol/L vs (10.79±3.81) mmol/L, 3 d: (3.35±1.01) mmol/L vs (7.72±3.64) mmol/L, 4 d: (3.45±0.77) mmol/L vs (6.57±3.17) mmol/L, 5 d: (3.73±1.26) mmol/L vs (5.61±3.07) mmol/L; TC 2 d: (4.83±2.29) mmol/L vs (8.2±2.82) mmol/L, 3 d: (4.23±2.17) mmol/L vs (7.71±2.68) mmol/L, 4 d: (4.28±1.59) mmol/L vs (7.55±2.41) mmol/L, 5 d: (4.1±1.21) mmol/L vs (7.84±2.6) mmol/L], with a more rapid decrease. LDL levels in the LMWH+INS and DFPP groups showed similar trends, with significant decreases at 2 day after admission [(5.41±3.24) mmol/L vs (2.96±1.47) mmol/L, (4.99±3.51) mmol/L vs (2.47±1.53) mmol/L]. The differences mentioned above are all statistically significant (all P value <0.001). No significant changes were observed in HDL levels in either LMWH+INS and DFPP groups at 2-5 days after admission. After matching, the DFPP group had a significantly longer time of resuming feeding [3(2, 3) days vs 4(3, 6) days] and higher hospital cost [12113.87 (9055.31, 14401.84) yuan vs 28025.34 (25388.11, 36335.48) yuan] compared with the LMWH+INS group, with statistically significant differences. Conclusions:DFPP could reduce TG and TC levels more rapidly and effectively than LMWH combined with INS, but does not show an advantage in improving clinical outcomes and reducing hospitalization costs.
