Application of a Modified Chest Drainage Management Protocol in Rapid Recovery of Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Pulmonary Resection
10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2025.04.006
- VernacularTitle:改良胸腔引流管理方案在胸腔镜肺切除患者快速康复中的应用
- Author:
Huayan LI
1
;
Dongze LI
1
;
Zihan ZHOU
1
;
Wenfang WU
1
;
Rongrong FAN
1
Author Information
1. 北京大学人民医院胸外科,北京 100044
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Video-assisted thoracic surgery;
Chest drainage management;
Enhanced recovery after surgery
- From:
Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
2025;25(4):222-226
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the effect of a modified chest drainage management protocol on rapid recovery in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung resection.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data of 218 patients who underwent segmentectomy,lobectomy,or combined lobectomy surgeries between July 2022 and December 2023 in our department.One medical group utilized the traditional chest drainage management protocol(control group,109 cases),while the other medical group employed the modified chest drainage management protocol(modified group,109 cases).The control group had a large chest tube(20-24F)placed at the mid-axillary line of the 7th intercostal space leading to the apex of the pleural cavity(removed when drainage volume＜300 ml/24 h and air leak＜20 ml/min).In contrast,the modified group had a large tube placed from the anterior axillary line between the 3rd and 4th intercostal spaces leading to the apex of the pleural cavity(removed when air leak＜20 ml/min),and a small tube(7F)placed at the posterior axillary line between the 7th and 8th intercostal spaces near the diaphragm surface(removed when drainage volume＜300 ml/24 h).Comparisons were made between the two groups regarding duration of large tube placement and total duration tube placement,total drainage volume,postoperative hospital stay,and postoperative complications.The pain scores,number of cases with moderate to severe pain(pain score ≥4),analgesic pump drug usage,and functional activity score(FAS)were recorded on the 1st and 2nd day after surgery.Results The duration of large tube placement was shorter in the modified group than in the control group[(2.1±1.6)dvs.(2.7±1.8)d,t=-2.715,P=0.007].and the total duration of tube placement was longer in the modified group than in the control group[(3.3±2.0)dvs.(2.7±1.8)d,t=2.308,P=0.022].without increasing postoperative hospital stay[(4.2±2.2)dvs.(4.1±2.1)d,t=0.247,P=0.805].On the postoperative day 2,the modified group showed lower pain scores during activity than the control group[(2.1±1.1)points vs.(2.6±1.3)points,t=-2.885,P=0.004].fewer cases with moderate to severe pain(5 cases vs.14 cases,x2=4.670,P=0.031),and less analgesic pump drug usage[(17.9±16.2)ml vs.(27.4±29.4)ml,t=-2.951,P=0.004].No significant differences were observed in other indicators between the two groups(P＞0.05).Additionally,the proportion of patients with FAS grade A(no activity limitation due to pain)was higher in the modified group than in the control group on the postoperative day 2[61.5％(67/109)vs.46.8％(51/109),Z=-2.170,P=0.030].There were no significant differences in postoperative complications and incision healing rates between the two groups(P＞0.05).Conclusion The modified chest drainage management protocol not only ensures adequate drainage but also reduces the degree of pain and improves activity status,aligning with the principles of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS).
