Impact of surgical margin on the prognosis of liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma based on propensity score-matched analysis
10.3760/cma.j.cn113884-20241230-00396
- VernacularTitle:基于倾向性评分匹配分析手术切缘对肝细胞癌患者肝切除术后预后的影响
- Author:
Sichang WU
1
;
Xinli GAN
;
Shuxin HUANG
;
Yujun ZHONG
;
Haojie YANG
;
Bangde XIANG
Author Information
1. 广西医科大学附属肿瘤医院肝胆外科，南宁 530021
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Carcinoma, hepatocellular;
Liver dysfunction;
Margins of excision;
Postoperative recurrence;
Propensity score matching
- From:
Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery
2025;31(7):510-514
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To study the influence of surgical margins on the prognosis of anatomical hepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis.Methods:Clinical data of 200 patients with HCC undergoing anatomical hepatectomy at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from December 2019 to December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, including 169 males and 31 females, aged 53.4±12.0 years. Patients were divided into the narrow margin group (surgical margin ≤10 mm, n=133) and wide margin group (>10 mm, n=67) according to the width of the surgical margin. PSM was used to compare preoperative indicators such as the maximum diameter of the tumor, the integrity of the tumor capsule, sublesions, and the clinical stage of Barcelona liver cancer (BCLC), perioperative indicators such as intraoperative blood loss, and 24-hour postoperative laboratory indicators such as alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase between the two groups of patients. The prognosis was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the postoperative recurrence-free survival rate of the two groups was compared by the log-rank test. Yates corrected chi-square test was used to analyze the postoperative liver function of the two groups of patients. Results:Before PSM, 133 cases were included in the narrow margin group and 67 cases in the wide margin group. There were statistically significant differences in the clinical stage of BCLC, intraoperative blood loss, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and alkaline phosphatase between the two groups (all P<0.05). After PSM, 55 cases were included in both the narrow margin group and the wide margin group. There were no statistically significant differences in the clinical stage, intraoperative blood loss, alanine aminotransferase and other indicators of BCLC between the two groups (all P>0.05). The 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year recurrence-free survival rates of the wide margin group were 94.2%, 80.1%, and 75.1% respectively, which were higher than those of the narrow margin group (71.8%, 52.9%, and 44.1%), the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=6.25, P=0.012). After PSM, a total of 12 patients (10.9%, 12/110) in the two groups developed liver dysfunction after the operation, among which 10 cases (18.2%, 10/55) were in the wide margin group and 2 cases (3.6%, 2/55). The incidence of postoperative liver dysfunction in the wide margin group was higher than that in the narrow margin group, the difference was statistically significant difference ( χ2=4.58, P=0.032). Conclusion:A surgical margin >10 mm can improve the relapse free survival rate, but it will increase the incidence of postoperative liver dysfunction.
