Study on the evaluation based on real-world data for clinical use of two kinds of absorbable hemostatic gauzes
10.3969/j.issn.1672-8270.2025.02.022
- VernacularTitle:基于真实世界数据的两种可吸收止血纱布临床使用评价研究
- Author:
Yan YANG
1
;
Zhengying QIAN
1
;
Zhifang PENG
1
;
Zhenzhu CHEN
1
Author Information
1. 南京医科大学附属无锡人民医院(南京医科大学无锡医学中心、无锡市人民医院)医学工程处 无锡 214023
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Absorbable hemostatic gauze;
Real-world date;
Changing trend;
Relevance analysis
- From:
China Medical Equipment
2025;22(2):121-125
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the changing trends and influencing factors of two kinds of absorbable hemostatic gauze in clinical use based on real-world data,so as to provide a reference for the refined management of absorbable hemostatic gauze.Methods:Data of surgical samples of a total of 34658 pieces of absorbable hemostatic gauzes,whose brand include brand A and brand B,in 27,468 surgeries of the Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between January 1,2015 and December 31,2023 were selected.In them,12729 surgeries used hemostatic gauzes(18,457 pieces)of brand A,and 14,739 surgeries used hemostatic gauzes(16,201 pieces)of brand B.The changing trends of the usage and cost of two kinds of absorbable hemostatic gauzes were compared and analyzed,which correlations of that with the different indicators of workload also were compared and analyzed.Results:The usage amount of absorbable hemostatic gauze of brand B increased annually,which had higher average costs per surgery but lower average usage amount per surgery.Brand B was mainly used in surgery of level-4.Both the usage amounts of brand A(18,457 pieces)and brand B(16,201 pieces)showed a positive correlation with the proportion of patients with difficult and critically ill(r=0.232,0.593,P<0.05),as well as with the proportion of medical consumables expenditure(r=0.334,0.491,P<0.05).Compared to brand A,brand B demonstrated a stronger positive correlation with the proportion of patients with difficult and critically ill,and the proportion of consumables expenditure.However,there was no significant correlation between the usage amount of each brand and the number of inpatients who received surgeries(P>0.05).The usage amount of absorbable hemostatic gauze of each brand was negative correlation with the proportion of pharmaceutical expenditure(r=-0.538,-0.696,P<0.05).Conclusion:The evaluation based on real-world data for clinical use of absorbable hemostatic gauze can reveal that brand B is gradually replacing brand A in clinical application.In clinical practice,the surgery with higher-level more prefers to use brand B.This result can guide management departments to monitor the use of absorbable hemostatic gauze.However,the balance between clinical demand and cost-effectiveness also should be considered,so as to promote the rational use of hemostatic materials,and ensure effective allocation for resource.