Design and implementation of the course of Basic Geriatric Care Skills based on the ADDIE model
10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20240512-02120
- VernacularTitle:基于ADDIE模型的老年基础照护技能课程设计与应用
- Author:
Yuan WANG
1
;
Yueping ZHU
;
Yuanyuan REN
;
Yaling LI
Author Information
1. 重庆医科大学附属第一医院心血管内科，重庆 400016
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Geriatric care;
Care skill;
ADDIE model;
Home care
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
2025;24(9):1284-1290
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the design and implementation effectiveness of the course of Basic Geriatric Care Skills for undergraduate nursing students.Methods:The 496 undergraduate nursing students enrolled in 2019 at The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were selected as the observation group, while 668 undergraduate nursing students enrolled in 2018 served as the control group. The control group received traditional teaching method, whereas the observation group was additionally provided with the course of Basic Geriatric Care Skills. The course was designed following the five steps of the ADDIE (analysis, design, development, implement, evaluation) model. The design was evaluated using the Delphi expert consultation method. Evaluation of teaching effectiveness included care skill assessment and performance evaluation. The overall evaluation of the course by students was collected through a questionnaire on the Superstar platform. SPSS 25.0 was used for χ2 test and independent samples t test. Results:The course consisted of 8 credit hours and was delivered through both online and offline approaches. The course included 4 modules with 20 care skills. The Cronbach's α values for the two rounds of expert consultation were 0.972 and 0.873, and the Kendall's W values were 0.124 ( χ2=61.38, P<0.05) and 0.260 ( χ2=128.83, P<0.001), respectively. The mean score of care skill assessment was 95.65±2.99 in the observation group and 94.16±3.52 in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.001). In performance evaluation, the highest-scoring dimension was teamwork (19.18±0.88), while the lowest was practical application (18.51±0.94). Questionnaire results indicated that 97.31% (289) of students found the course helpful in learning geriatric care, and 85.86% (255) of students deemed the course necessary. Conclusions:The course of Basic Geriatric Care Skills was well designed to meet the needs of students and to help improve their geriatric care skills.
