Application effect of emergency risk management mode in emergency treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction and its safety
10.3969/j.issn.1008-0074.2025.03.09
- VernacularTitle:急救风险管理模式在急性心肌梗死患者急诊中的应用成效与安全性分析
- Author:
Fan LI
1
;
Lian-hua SHEN
;
Ying LIU
Author Information
1. 海安市人民医院急诊科,江苏南通 226600
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Myocardial infarction;
Emergency medical services;
Troponin I
- From:
Chinese Journal of cardiovascular Rehabilitation Medicine
2025;34(3):327-332
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the application effect of emergency risk management in emergency treatment of pa-tients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI)and its safety.Methods:This randomized controlled study enrolled 103 AMI patients admitted in Haian People's Hospital between April 2020 and January 2023.Patients were divided into intervention group(n=51)and control group(n=52).Patients in intervention group received emergency risk management measures,while those in control group received routine management measures.Rescue quality,heart function,scores of Connor-Davidson resilience scale(CD-RISC),coronary self-management scale(CSMS)and incidence of adverse events were compared between two groups.Results:Compared to patients in the control group,those in intervention group had significant higher rescue success rate(96.0％vs.46.0％),and significant lower emergency stop time[(23.01±2.77)h vs.(36.61±3.00)h]and length of stay[(8.74±2.68)d vs.(15.52±2.91)d](P＜0.001 all).Compared with patients in the control group,those in the intervention group had significant lower cardiac troponin I(cTnI)[(0.48±0.28)ng/L vs.(1.05±0.57)ng/L],heart rate(HR)[(68.13±1.88)beats/min vs.(84.87±1.59)beats/min],left ventricular end-diastolic diameter(LVEDd)[(40.98±0.58)mm vs.(52.09±0.55)mm]and left atrial volume index(LAVI)[(27.07±0.58)ml/m2 vs.(36.86±0.65)ml/m2],and significant higher left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF)[(67.93±0.56)％vs.(56.91±0.59)％](P＜0.001all).Compared with patients in the control group,those in the intervention group had significant higher scores of CD-RISC[(98.10±1.61)points vs.(71.33±1.87)points]and CSMS[(131.58±1.76)points vs.(111.82±1.75)points](P＜0.001 all),and significant lower incidence of adverse events(4.0％vs.16.0％,P=0.046).Conclusion:Emergency risk management may improve the rescue quality and en-hance cardiac function,and help to improve the psychological resilience and self-management ability in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
