5.0T and 3.0T Coronary Magnetic Resonance Angiography Based on Compressed Sensing Acceleration:A Comparative Study
10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185.2025.07.004
- VernacularTitle:基于压缩感知加速的5.0T与3.0T冠状动脉磁共振成像对比研究
- Author:
Shihai ZHAO
1
;
Zhengyu XU
;
Yubo GUO
;
Gan SUN
;
Lu LIN
;
Yining WANG
Author Information
1. 中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 北京协和医院放射科,北京 100730
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Magnetic resonance imaging;
Ultra-high field;
Coronary magnetic resonance angiography;
Compressed sensing;
Volunteers
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging
2025;33(7):706-711
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Purpose To compare the 5.0T gradient echo coronary magnetic resonance angiography(CMRA)using compressed sensing(CS)acceleration technology(5.0TCS-CMRA)vs.3.0T gradient echo-CMRA(3.0TCS-CMRA)using CS.Materials and Methods Twenty-five healthy volunteers aged 23 to 30 years from December 16,2023 to January 14,2024 at Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences were prospective enrolled in this study.The interval between 3.0TCS-CMRA and 5.0TCS-CMRA was within two weeks.3.0TCS-CMRA used T2 preparation and 5.0TCS-CMRA did not use T2 preparation.The image quality scores,coronary artery length,signal-to-noise ratio(SNR)and contrast-to-noise ratio between coronary blood and adjacent myocardium or tissue(CNRmyo-blood)were evaluated.Results On 5.0TCS-CMRA,the SNR and CNRmyo-blood of the proximal right coronary artery(RCA)in 25 healthy volunteers were significantly higher than those of 3.0TCS-CMRA(SNR:318.07±94.06 vs.223.81±51.19,t=-5.609,P<0.001;CNRmyo-blood:212.75±91.44 vs.149.70±59.53,Z=-3.619,P<0.001),while the SNR and CNRmyo-blood of proximal left anterior descending coronary artery(LAD)and left circumflex coronary artery(LCX)were not significantly higher than those of 3.0TCS-CMRA(SNR:315.52±102.49 vs.306.35±92.85,t=-0.627,P=0.536;289.72±88.79 vs.272.87±84.68,t=-1.226,P=0.232;CNRmyo-blood:135.83±93.53 vs.203.94±74.30,t=4.132,P<0.001;117.66±79.63 vs.161.60±78.91,t=3.127,P=0.005).The length of the three coronary arteries measured by 5.0TCS-CMRA was significantly shorter than that of 3.0TCS-CMRA[RCA:(126.04±31.54)mm vs.(137.20±29.93)mm,t=2.911,P=0.008;LAD:(122.68±24.63)mm vs.(134.24±23.38)mm,Z=-3.026,P=0.002;LCX:(57.07±26.70)mm vs.(68.27±24.02)mm,t=2.552,P=0.018].There was no significant difference in the scanning time required between 3.0TCS-CMRA and 5.0TCS-CMRA[(8.60±2.84)min vs.(8.30±2.32)min,Z=-0.183,P=0.855].The image scores of the three major coronary arteries of 5.0TCS-CMRA were significantly lower than those of 3.0TCS-CMRA(RCA:2.52±0.59 vs.3.16±0.69,Z=-3.258,P=0.001;LAD:2.72±0.74 vs.3.24±0.66,Z=-2.540,P=0.011;LCX:2.44±0.71 vs.3.00±0.87,Z=-2.462,P=0.014).Conclusion In the absence of T2 preparation,5.0TCS-CMRA can still show obvious advantages in the SNR and CNRmyo-blood of proximal RCA compared with 3.0TCS-CMRA,which suggests the application potential of 5.0TCS-CMRA.In the future,a suitable T2 preparation pulse or potential alternative may significantly improve the performance of the 5.0TCS-CMRA.
