Comprehensive Evaluation of the Quality of Huaihua Powder by Different Hospital Decoction Methods
- VernacularTitle:槐花散医院代煎剂不同煎煮方法质量综合比较
- Author:
Guozhe ZHANG
1
;
Lei ZHANG
;
Hongxia LIU
;
Yiyu QIN
;
Kaiwen HU
;
Jie GAO
;
Yue HAN
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords: Huaihua powders; Substitute decoctions; Automatic decoction machine; Indicator components; HPLC fingerprint
- From: World Science and Technology-Modernization of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2025;27(8):2150-2160
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
- Abstract: Objective To comprehensively evaluate the quality difference of Huaihua powder obtained by the hospital's electromagnetic furnace decoction method and automatic decoction machine decoction method.Methods Five methods(induction cooker decoction(once decoction,twice decoction),normal pressure decoction(once decoction,twice decoction),and pressure decoction)were used to prepare the decoction.The HPLC method used a Shiseido CAPCELL PAK-C18(250 mm×4.6 mm,5 μm)column,with a UV detection wavelength of 254 nm,mobile phase of acetonitrile 0.1%phosphoric acid water,column temperature of 30℃,flow rate of 1.0 mL/min,and detection of index components including rutin,naringin,quercitrin,neohesperidin,quercetin,and menthone.The extraction rate of the index components was calculated and the cream yield of each decoction was detected.The evaluation of quality differences is based on the comprehensive score of cream yield(40%)and indicator components(60%).Results The HPLC fingerprint similarity of Huaihua powder prepared by 5 decoction methods was greater than 99%.There was no significant difference(P>0.05)in the yield of ointment and the content of indicator components between the induction cooker one decoction and the induction cooker twice decoction methods.The yield of ointment and the extraction rate of indicator components were significantly higher in twice normal pressure decoction using a decoction machine than once normal pressure decoction using a decoction machine(P<0.05).The index component score of machine under pressure decoction once was the highest,but the comprehensive score of twice normal pressure decoction was the highest,with a combined score of 92.13 and 89.58,respectively,far higher than the 36.01,18.79,and 15.60 of the other three decoction methods.Classify the decoction into three categories through cluster analysis.Orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis was used to screen for rutin,naringin and neohesperidin as differential biomarkers.Conclusion The quality of Huaihua powder decocted by a decoction machine is significantly better than that by an induction cooker,and the twice decocted at normal pressure by the decoction machine are significantly better than those decocted at normal pressure once.Decoction under pressure once may be a better choice.
