Effects of dexmedetomidine combined with propofol or cyclopropofol on postoperative stress in laparoscopic ovarian cancer surgery
10.3760/cma.j.cn431274-20240919-01442
- VernacularTitle:右美托咪啶分别联合丙泊酚、环泊酚对卵巢癌腹腔镜术后应激的影响
- Author:
Tengna SHI
1
;
Lijie WANG
;
Jun WANG
;
Lishuang ZHONG
;
Linlin SONG
Author Information
1. 衡水市第二人民医院麻醉科，衡水 053000
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Dexmedetomidine;
Ciprofol;
Propofol;
Ovarian neoplasms;
Laparoscopy;
Stress response
- From:
Journal of Chinese Physician
2025;27(6):841-846
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the effects of dexmedetomidine (Dex) combined with propofol or cyclopropofol on postoperative stress in laparoscopic ovarian cancer surgery.Methods:A total of 120 ovarian cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic radical resection of ovarian cancer in the Second People′s Hospital of Hengshui from January 2022 to December 2023 were selected and divided into observation group and control group by random number table method, with 60 cases in each group. The control group was given Dex combined with propofol for compound anesthesia, and the observation group was given Dex combined with cyclopropofol for compound anesthesia. The perioperative indicators and intraoperative opioid dosage were compared between the two groups. The heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were compared at 3 min after entering the operating room (T 1), intubation (T 2), skin incision (T 3), extubation (T 4) and leaving the operating room (T 5). The Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) scores at T 1, T 2, T 3, T 4 and Prince-Henry scores at 2, 6, 12, 24 h after operation were compared. The serum levels of prostin E 2 (PGE 2) and cortisol (Cor) 1 day before operation and 12, 24, 48 h after operation, as well as the incidence of adverse events during treatment were compared between the two groups. Results:The anesthesia recovery time in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group, and the intraoperative dosages of sufentanil and remifentanil were significantly less than those in the control group (all P<0.05). Compared with T 1, there were no significant differences in HR and MAP at T 2, T 3, T 4 in the observation group (all P>0.05); the HR and MAP at T 2, T 3, T 4 in the control group were significantly different from those at T 1 (all P<0.05), and the HR and MAP at T 2, T 3, T 4, T 5 in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (all P<0.05). The RSS scores at T 2, T 3 and T 4 in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (all P<0.05). The Prince-Henry scores at 2, 6, 12, 24 h after operation in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (all P<0.05). The serum PGE 2 and Cor levels at 12, 24 and 48 h after operation in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (all P<0.05). The total incidence of postoperative adverse events in the observation group was 18.33%(11/60), lower than 23.33%(14/60) in the control group ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Compared with Dex combined with propofol, Dex combined with cyclopropofol for compound anesthesia can reduce postoperative stress response in laparoscopic ovarian cancer surgery, improve intraoperative sedation and postoperative analgesia, stabilize hemodynamics, and has good safety.
