Comparison of routine pulmonary ventilation function and impulse oscillometry in children with controlled and uncontrolled bronchial asthma
10.3760/cma.j.cn431274-20240124-00162
- VernacularTitle:支气管哮喘控制与未控制患儿的常规肺通气功能与脉冲振荡肺功能指标比较
- Author:
Guirong PI
1
;
Shengwen DUAN
;
Yali JIANG
;
Xiaopeng ZHANG
Author Information
1. 深圳市龙华区人民医院儿科，深圳 518109
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Asthma;
Child;
Pulmonary function test;
Impulse oscillometry
- From:
Journal of Chinese Physician
2025;27(2):225-229
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the difference between routine pulmonary ventilation function test (PFT) and impulse oscillometry (IOS) in children with bronchial asthma (BA) control and children without BA control.Methods:A total of 165 BA children admitted to the Shenzhen Longhua District People′s Hospital from January to December 2023 were selected. 73 children with asthma control test score ≥23 were selected as the control group, and 92 children with asthma control test score <23 were selected as the control group. The difference of indexes between the two groups were statistically compared in terms of PFT [forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV 1), ratio of FEV 1 to forced vital capacity (FVC) (FEV 1/FVC), instantaneous forced expiratory flow at 50% of forced vital capacity (FEF 50), instantaneous forced expiratory flow at 75% of forced vital capacity (FEF 75), maximum mid expiratory flow (MMEF), peak expiratory flow (PEF)], and IOS metrics [respiratory resistance at 5 Hz (R5), respiratory resistance at 20 Hz (R20), difference between R5 and R20 (R5-R20), reactance at 5 Hz (X5), total respiratory impedance at 5 Hz (Z5), resonance frequency (Fres), reactance area (AX)]. The predictive value of PFT and IOS indexes to BA was analyzed. Results:The levels of FEV 1, FEV 1/FVC, FEF 50, FEF 75, PEF and MMEF in PFT index of the control group were significantly higher than those in the non-control group, and the levels of Z5, R5, R20, R5-R20, X5, AX and Fres in IOS index were significantly lower than those in the non-control group. There was statistical significance between the two groups (all P<0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) predicted by PFT indexes was less than 0.7, and the AUC of FEF 50 and MMEF (all 0.633) was the largest. Among the IOS indexes, Z5, R5, R5-R20, X5, AX and Fres predicted the AUC of BA uncontrolled to be >0.7, while AX had the largest predictive value for BA uncontrolled (AUC=0.786, 95% CI: 0.736-0.836), sensitivity was 78.26%, specificity was 64.13%. Conclusions:All indexes of PFT and IOS have good sensitivity in evaluating the degree of BA control in children, and IOS has better clinical value in predicting uncontrolled BA, among which AX has the greatest predictive value for uncontrolled BA.
