MRI quantitative parameters and free/total prostate-specific antigen ratio for diagnosing prostate imaging reporting and data system 3-point clinically significant prostate cancer
10.13929/j.issn.1003-3289.2025.05.016
- VernacularTitle:MRI定量参数及游离/总前列腺特异性抗原比值诊断前列腺影像报告与数据系统3分临床显著前列腺癌
- Author:
Zewen LIU
1
;
Qin LI
;
Xiaomei JIANG
;
Yongsheng CHEN
;
Ying CHEN
;
Qingliang NIU
Author Information
1. 山东第二医科大学医学影像学院,山东 潍坊 261021
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
prostatic neoplasms;
magnetic resonance imaging;
diagnosis,differential
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
2025;41(5):768-772
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the value of MRI quantitative parameters and free/total prostate-specific antigen ratio(f/tPSA)for diagnosing prostate imaging reporting and data system(PI-RADS)3-point clinically significant prostate cancer(csPCa).Methods Totally 57 patients with PI-RADS 3-point prostate lesions were retrospectively enrolled,including 18 prostate cancer(PCa)(PCa group)and 39 benign hyperplasia with chronic prostatitis(non-PCa group).The former included 12 cases of csPCa and 6 cases of clinically insignificant PCa(ciPCa).Taken non-PCa and ciPCa into non-csPCa group(n=45),laboratory and MRI parameters(apparent diffusion coefficient[ADC],T1,T2,proton density[PD]values)were compared between PCa and non-PCa groups,also between csPCa and non-csPCa groups.Based on laboratory and MRI parameters being statistically different between groups according to univariate analysis,combined models were established using logistic regression.The efficacy of laboratory,MRI parameters and combined models for differentiating PCa and non-PCa as well as csPCa and non-csPCa were evaluated.Results ADC,T1,T2,PD values in PCa group were all lower those in non-PCa group(all P＜0.05),and f/tPSA,ADC,T1,T2 and PD values in csPCa group were all lower than those in non-csPCa group(all P＜0.05).AUC of ADC,T1,T2 and PD values for differentiating PCa from non-PCa was 0.662,0.755,0.793 and 0.729 respectively,while of ADC-T1-T2-PD combined model was 0.839,higher than that of ADC alone(P＜0.05)but not significantly different with T1,T2 and PD values alone(all P＞0.05).AUC of f/tPSA,ADC,T1,T2 and PD values for differentiating csPCa from non-csPCa was 0.692,0.759,0.741,0.805 and 0.737,respectively,while of ADC-T1-T2-PD combined model was 0.889,higher than that of f/tPSA,ADC and T1 values alone(all P＜0.05)but not significantly different with that of T2 and PD value alone(both P＞0.05).AUC of f/tPSA-ADC-T1-T2-PD combined model was 0.898,higher than that of f/tPSA,ADC,T1 and PD values alone(all P＜0.05)but not significantly different with T2 value and ADC-T1-T2-PD combined model(both P＞0.05).Conclusion MRI quantitative parameters combined with f/tPSA could effectively diagnose PI-RADS 3-point csPCa.
