Systematic review of a body image assessment tool for burn patients
10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2025.04.014
- VernacularTitle:烧伤患者身体意象特异性评估工具的系统评价
- Author:
Ning LIU
1
;
Jingling LI
;
Shunli ZUO
;
Xiuyuan ZHU
;
Yiping FANG
;
Lihong QIU
Author Information
1. 519041 珠海市 遵义医科大学珠海校区基础部全科医学基础教研室
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Burn;
Body Image Specificity Assessment Tool;
Scale;
Reliability;
Vali-dity;
Systematic Review
- From:
Chinese Journal of Nursing
2025;60(4):478-486
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective The measurement characteristics of body image specificity evaluation tools for burn patients were systematically evaluated,aims to provide reference for selecting appropriate assessment tools.Methods CNKI,Wanfang data knowledge service platform,VIP database,China Biomedical Literature Service system,PubMed,Embase,Web of Science,PsycINFO and CINAHL were searched by computer to collect and evaluate the measurement characteristics of burn patients'body image specificity evaluation tools from the establishment of the database to April 15,2024.There were 2 researchers who independently reviewed the collected literature,looked for the full text and extracted information.At the same time,the methodological quality and measurement performance of such assessment tools were systematically evaluated under the guidance of consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instrument(COSMIN)guidelines.Finally,the quality and strength were rated to form a recommendation.Results A total of 6 studies were included,including 3 evaluation tools for body image specificity of burn patients,namely the Body Image Quality of Life Inventory into Brazilian Portuguese(BIQLI-BP),Satisfaction with Appearance Scale(SWAP),and the Derriford Appearance Scale 59(DAS59).In the development of PROMs,the overall quality of BIQLI-BP,SWAP and DAS59 is"doubtful".In terms of content validity,the methodological quality of BIQLI-BP,SWAP and DAS59 was evaluated as"doubtful".In terms of construct validity,the methodological quality of SWAP and DAS59 was evaluated as"good"and"very good"respectively,while the methodological quality of BIQLI-BP was"inadequate".In terms of internal consistency,the methodological quality of BIQLI-BP,SWAP and DAS59 was"very good".In terms of stability,the BIQLI-BP and DAS59 were"unreported",and the methodological quality evaluation of the SWAP was"doubtful".In terms of criterion validity,the BIQLI-BP and DAS59 scales were"unreported",and the methodological quality evaluation of the SWAP scale was"inadequate".In terms of measurement errors,the BIQLI-BP and DAS59 scales were"unreported",and the methodological quality evaluation of the SWAP scale was"doubtful".In the aspect of hypothesis test,except that the DAS59 scale is"unreported",the methodological quality of BIQLI-BP scale is"very good"and the evaluation of SWAP scale is"doubtful".Conclusion Among the existing body image specificity evaluation tools for burn patients,the SWAP has good measurement performance and it can be recommended for the time being.The number of specific evaluation tools for body image of burn patients in China is relatively insufficient,and more localization studies should be carried out in the future.
