Complication profiles of different surgical repair techniques for donor sites following lingual mucosa graft harvesting: a comparative study
10.3760/cma.j.cn112330-20250218-00059
- VernacularTitle:舌黏膜取材创面不同修补方式并发症的对照研究
- Author:
Song LI
1
;
Jiemin SI
;
Xuxiao XIE
;
Wenxiong SONG
;
Zuowei LI
;
Fangmin CHEN
;
Kai LI
;
Yinglong SA
Author Information
1. 天津市第三中心医院泌尿外科，天津 300170
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Urethral stricture;
Lingual mucosa;
Acellular dermal matrix;
Wound healing;
Postoperative complications
- From:
Chinese Journal of Urology
2025;46(8):611-616
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare postoperative complications between acellular dermal matrix（ADM）and direct suture for tongue mucosa defect repair during lingual mucosa urethroplasty.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 106 patients with anterior urethral stricture who underwent lingual mucosal urethroplasty at the Sixth People’s Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from July 2022 to July 2024. According to the needs of urethral reconstruction，lingual mucosa was harvested（graft length 0.5 cm longer than the stricture length）. Using an instrumental variable method based on the surgeon’s preference，the tongue wound was repaired either with ADM or direct suture. The ADM group included 56 patients，aged（46.2±18.7）years；diabetes in 8 cases（14.3%），hypertension in 15 cases（26.8%），cardiopulmonary dysfunction in 3 cases（5.3%）；stricture location：penile segment in 44 cases（78.6%），penoscrotal junction in 12 cases（21.4%）；etiology：lichen sclerosus in 8 cases（14.3%），urethritis in 8 cases（14.3%），trauma in 24 cases（42.9%），and re-stricture after hypospadias surgery in 16 cases（28.6%）；maximum urinary flow rate（5.8±2.9）ml/s；graft length（4.02±1.72）cm. The direct suture group included 50 patients，aged（45.8±19.2）years；diabetes in 6 cases（12.0%），hypertension in 12 cases（24.0%），cardiopulmonary dysfunction in 2 cases（4.0%）；etiology：lichen sclerosus in 6 cases（12.0%），urethritis in 8 cases（16.0%），trauma in 25 cases（50.0%），and re-stricture after hypospadias surgery in 11 cases（22%）；stricture location：penile segment in 36 cases（72.0%），penoscrotal junction in 14 cases（28.0%）；maximum urinary flow rate（6.2±3.1）ml/s；graft length（4.18±1.68）cm. There were no statistically significant differences in the above baseline characteristics between the two groups（ P>0.05）.ADM group after electrocautery hemostasis，an ADM patch tailored to the wound size was used to cover the donor site. The edges of the ADM were overlapped with the wound margin and sutured to the submucosal layer using interrupted 4-0 polyglactin sutures. Direct suture group after electrocautery hemostasis，the wound was stretched into a diamond shape and closed in layers by suturing the mucosal layer down to the muscle layer using interrupted 4-0 polyglactin sutures. The primary outcome measures were postoperative tongue complications including hemorrhage，hematoma，and infection（Clavien-Dindo classification）. Secondary outcomes included VAS pain scores，functional recovery（difficulty drinking，difficulty eating，speech impairment，limited mouth opening），and sensory recovery（sensory disturbance，taste disturbance）. Results:The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 24 months，with a mean of 9.2 months. The 6-month follow-up rate was 100%. No Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅲ or higher complications（hemorrhage，hematoma，infection）occurred by the end of follow-up. Regarding secondary outcomes，the VAS pain score on postoperative day 1 was significantly better in the ADM group than in the suture group［0（0，3）vs. 2（0，3），P=0.013］.Functional impact：The incidence of difficulty drinking［24 cases（42.9%）vs. 36 cases（72.0%），16 cases（28.6%）vs. 36 cases（72.0%），8 cases（14.3%）vs. 21 cases（42.0%）］，difficulty eating［20 cases（35.7%）vs. 36 cases（72.0%），16 cases（28.6%）vs. 36 cases（72.0%），8 cases（14.3%）vs. 27 cases（54.0%）］，and speech impairment［20 cases（35.7%）vs. 36 cases（72.0%），16 cases（28.6%）vs. 36 cases（72.0%），8 cases（14.3%）vs. 27 cases（54.0%）］on postoperative day 1，day 7，and within the first month，respectively，was significantly lower in the ADM group（all P<0.05）. On postoperative day 1 and day 7，the incidence of limited mouth opening was higher in the ADM group［0 cases vs. 6 cases（12.0%），0 cases vs. 6 cases（12.0%）］（ P<0.05）.Sensory recovery：The incidence of taste disturbance was higher in the ADM group at 7 days［8 cases（14.3%）vs. 0 cases］，1 month［8 cases（14.3%）vs. 0 cases］，and 3 months［8 cases（14.3%）vs. 0 cases］postoperatively（ P<0.05）. The incidence of sensory disturbance was higher in the ADM group at 1 day［20 cases（35.7%）vs. 6 cases（12.0%）］，7 days［16 cases（28.6%）vs. 6 cases（12.0%）］，and 1 month［16 cases（28.6%）vs. 6 cases（12.0%）］postoperatively（ P<0.05）. Pain scores and complication rates were zero in both groups after 6 months. Conclusions:ADM repair improves early recovery but may increase transient sensory complications. Both methods are safe for clinical application.
