Comparison on Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients With Multivessel Disease and Diabetes Undergoing Different Revascularization Strategies
10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2025.11.005
- VernacularTitle:急性心肌梗死冠状动脉多支病变合并糖尿病患者不同血运重建方式的预后差异
- Author:
Bingxin MEN
1
;
Nana HU
;
Yaping ZHANG
;
Junlan ZHANG
;
Xiaolei SHI
;
Jin ZHANG
Author Information
1. 兰州大学第一临床医学院 内科学系,兰州 730000
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
acute myocardial infarction;
coronary multi-vessel disease;
type 2 diabetes;
percutaneous coronary intervention
- From:
Chinese Circulation Journal
2025;40(11):1081-1087
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objectives:To investigate the prognostic difference of different revascularization strategies in AMI patients with multi-vessel disease and diabetes.Methods:AMI patients with multi-vessel disease and diabetes admitted to the Department of Cardiology of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University from January 2022 to June 2024 were retrospectively included.Patients were divided into non complete revascularization(NCR)group(n=166),staged complete revascularization(SCR)group(n=152)and immediate complete revascularization(ICR)group(n=120).Baseline clinical characteristics,coronary angiography data and postoperative medication were compared among the groups.Primary endpoint was the major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events(MACCE)during follow-up.MACCE includes all-cause mortality,cardiogenic mortality,non-fatal myocardial infarction,unplanned revascularization and stroke.The log-rank test was used to analyze the significance of the differences in the cumulative incidence of MACCE among the three groups.Cox regression was used to explore the influencing factors of poor prognosis in patients.Results:There were statistically significant differences among NCR group,SCR group and ICR group in terms of the history of previous percutaneous coronary intervention,the use of intraoperative coronary intravascular ultrasound(IVUS)and the dosage of contrast agent(all P<0.05).During a median follow-up of 21(11,25)months,MACCE events occurred in 59 cases(35.5%)in the NCR group,26 cases(17.1%)in the SCR group,and 30 cases(25.0%)in the ICR group.The Kaplan-Meier curve showed that the differences in the cumulative incidence of MACCE among the three groups were statistically significant(log-rank P<0.001).Using the Bonferroni correction(adjusted α′=0.05/3≈0.0167),pairwise comparisons revealed statistically significant differences between the NCR and SCR groups(log-rank P<0.001)and between the NCR and ICR groups(log-rank P=0.011).However,no statistically significant difference was observed between the SCR and ICR groups(log-rank P=0.228).Cox multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that history of hypertension was an independent risk factor for MACCE in AMI patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and diabetes(HR=1.71,95%CI:1.10-2.64,P<0.05).The difference in the incidence of MACCE between the SCR group and the NCR group was statistically significant(HR=0.45,95%CI:0.28-0.73,P=0.001).Conclusions:Staged complete revascularization serves as the preferred revascularization strategy for AMI patients with multivessel coronary disease and diabetes mellitus.Additionally,for patients with concomitant hypertension,blood pressure management should be intensified to reduce the risk of MACCE.
