Effects of proton FLASH irradiation and conventional irradiation on the cell cycle and death of renal cancer cells
10.3760/cma.j.cn112271-20250701-00217
- VernacularTitle:质子FLASH照射和常规照射对肾癌细胞周期和死亡的影响
- Author:
Jun ZHANG
1
;
Siqian ZHANG
;
Qiaojuan WANG
;
Li SUI
;
Yongsheng ZHANG
;
Zhifei CAO
Author Information
1. 苏州大学附属第二医院病理科，苏州 215004
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
FLASH radiation;
Conventional radiation;
Cell cycle;
Apoptosis;
Pyroptosis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
2025;45(11):1100-1106
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the effects of proton FLASH irradiation (FLASH-IR) and conventional irradiation (CONV-IR) on the cell cycle, apoptosis, and pyroptosis of renal cancer cells.Methods:Renal cancer cells (769-P) were irradiated with 8 Gy of protons at a dose rate of 40 Gy/s for FLASH-IR and 0.4 Gy/s for CONV-IR, Ctrl group was treated without irradiation. Cells were collected 24 h after irradiation. The changes in the cell cycle were measured using flow cytometry. The expression of genes and proteins related to the cell cycle, apoptosis, and pyroptosis signaling pathways in renal cancer cells was measured using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and Western blot.Results:Proton FLASH-IR increased the proportion of renal cancer cells in the G 0/G 1 phase [FLASH-IR group vs. Ctrl group, (67.01±0.44)% vs. (38.68±0.63)%, t = -63.99, P<0.05], while CONV-IR increased the proportion of renal cancer cells in the G 2/M phase [CONV-IR group vs. Ctrl group, (56.65±1.52)% vs. (23.67±0.51)%, t = -29.17, P<0.05]. Both proton FLASH-IR and CONV-IR caused apoptosis of renal cancer cells ( tFLASH= -16.24 to -5.01, P <0.05; tCONV=-20.08 to 6.11, P < 0.05) and CONV-IR activated the P53/P21 pathway ( t = -16.86 to -9.74, P < 0.05). Both proton FLASH-IR and CONV-IR induced pyroptosis of renal cancer cells ( tFLASH= -23.36 to 20.18, P <0.05; tCONV=-41.62 to 13.95, P <0.05), and the former exhibited a greater effect (FLASH-IR group vs. CONV-IR group, 0.96±0.01 vs. 0.68±0.44, t = -10.46, P <0.05). Conclusions:Both proton FLASH-IR and CONV-IR bring about changes in the cell cycle of renal cancer, promoting apoptosis and pyroptosis. However, there are differences between the two mechanisms that require further exploration. Proton FLASH-IR holds promise for the treatment of renal cancer.
