Structural content and psychometric properties of fundamental movement skills assessment scales for school-age children based on ICF-CY:a systematic review
10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2025.10.008
- VernacularTitle:基于ICF-CY的学龄期儿童基本运动技能评估量表结构内容和心理测量特性的系统综述
- Author:
Haoqi ZHANG
1
;
Hua LIU
1
;
Pu SUN
1
;
Yanfei WEN
1
;
Jiyue ZHANG
1
;
Lu YANG
1
Author Information
1. 首都体育学院,北京市 100191
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
school-age children;
fundamental movement skills;
assessment scales;
motor skills assessment;
International Classification of Functioning,Disability and Health-Children and Youth Version;
psychometric properties
- From:
Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
2025;31(10):1172-1180
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To rexplore the content structure characteristics and psychometric properties of assessment scales for funda-mental movement skills(FMS)in school-aged children,based on International Classification of Functioning,Dis-ability and Health-Children and Youth Version(ICF-CY)framework.Methods Literatures on assessment scales for FMS in school-aged children were retrieved from PubMed,Science Di-rect,Web of Science,EMBase,PsycINFO,CNKI and Wanfang data from inception to July,2025.The contents of the included scales were analyzed using the ICF-CY linking rule.The COSMIN RoB tool was used to assess the psychometric properties of the scales,and the GRADE system was applied to evaluate the overall quality of evi-dence.Results A total of 29 studies were included,involving six assessment scales:Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Profi-ciency-2(BOT-2),Canadian Assessment of Movement Skill and Agility(CAMSA),K?rperkoordinationstest für Kinder(KTK),Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2(MABC-2),Motorische Basiskompetenzen test Battery(MOBAK),and Test of Gross Motor Development-3(TGMD-3).In the ICF-CY linking analysis,all six tools addressed joint mobility functions(b710)and joint stability functions(b715),while five of them also in-volved hand and arm use(d445).The number of linked items ranged from 5 to 11.BOT-2 and TGMD-3 linked to 11 items,showing broad coverage;BOT-2 focused more on the body function dimension,whereas TGMD-3 em-phasized activity and participation dimensions,especially the performance of hand function in daily activities.In bias risk assessment,TGMD-3 showed the lowest risk(50%rated A and 50%rated B),while MABC-2 had the highest proportion of C ratings(55.6%),followed by BOT-2(33.3%).In evidence grading,TGMD-3 was rated high quality,KTK moderate,BOT-2 and CAMSA low,and MABC-2 and MOBAK very low.Conclusion TGMD-3 is recommended as the primary tool for assessing FMS in school-aged children for broad coverage of ICF-CY items,strong psychometric properties and high evidence quality.KTK,with moderate evidence quali-ty,may serve as a secondary option,but should be used cautiously in China.Although CAMSA is easy to admin-ister,its validity and reliability are low,so it is only suitable for rapid classroom screening.BOT-2,despite cover-ing more ICF-CY items,has a higher bias risk and low evidence quality.MOBAK and MABC-2 have very low evidence quality and are not recommended for current use.
