Safety and efficacy of 3D printing personalized intramedullary stem in tumor prosthesis revision
10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20240807-00445
- VernacularTitle:3D打印定制股骨髓内柄在肿瘤假体翻修中的应用
- Author:
Kai ZHENG
1
;
Xiuchun YU
1
;
Ming XU
1
;
Haocheng CUI
1
;
Qian CHEN
1
;
Ziwei HOU
1
Author Information
1. 中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九六〇医院骨科，济南 250031
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Femoral neoplasms;
Printing, three-dimensional;
Prostheses and implants;
Reoperation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2025;45(2):102-108
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the application and clinical efficacy of customized, 3D-printed femoral bone marrow stems in the revision of tumor prostheses.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed for the data of 11 patients (7 males and 4 females) aged 53.1±11.7 years (range, 38-75 years), who underwent 3D-printed customized revision of femoral intramedullary stems due to loosening of femoral tumor prostheses at the 960th Hospital of the Joint Support Force of the PLA from June 2021 to June 2023. The pathological types of tumors associated with the initial surgeries included 4 cases of giant cell tumor of bone, 5 cases of osteosarcoma, 1 case of chondrosarcoma, and 1 case of plasma cell tumor. The tumor was located at the distal femur in 8 cases and the proximal femur in 3 cases. The procedures included 3 initial revisions, 7 secondary revisions, and 1 tertiary revision. The average limb shortening measured 4.6±2.2 cm (range, 2.5-9.0 cm). Prior to revision, all prostheses were fixed with bone cement, revealing enlargement of the femoral medullary cavity and cortical bone thinning. Among them, 5 cases had intramedullary stems permeabilizing the femoral cortex, and 1 case had femoral cleavage fractures. All 11 patients received personalized data for the design and 3D printing of femoral bone marrow stems.Results:The lengths and diameters of the 3D-printed porous femoral bone marrow stems ranged from 80 to 160 mm and 20 to 22 mm, respectively. Ten patients were fitted with cylindrical intramedullary handles, while one received a conical intramedullary handle. A successful revision with the 3D-printed stems was achieved in 10 patients; however, 1 case failed to accommodate the conical handle and was instead revised with a bone cement prosthesis. During the implantation of the intramedullary stems, three patients experienced minor cortical splitting, which was managed with bundling and fixation during the procedure. Immediate stability was attained for all prostheses during surgery, yet postoperative limb shortening did not undergo significant correction. All patients exhibited normal healing of their postoperative incisions. The visual analog scale for limb pain decreased significantly from 8.0±0.8 points before surgery to 1.0±0.4 points three months postoperatively ( t=25.957, P<0.001). By six months after the surgery, none of the patients reported any limb pain. Follow-up data for all 11 patients indicated an average follow-up duration of 25.2±7.5 months (range, 16-36 months), during which limb function improved satisfactorily. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score increased from 7.9±1.4 points preoperatively to 20.9±2.7 points at the last follow-up, with this change also being statistically significant ( t=14.229, P<0.001). Imaging evaluations revealed normal lower limb force lines, no rotation or longitudinal displacement of the prosthetic stem, and successful integration with the femur. Conclusion:Personalized intramedullary stems produced through 3D printing demonstrate significant clinical effectiveness in femoral tumor prosthesis revision surgery, making them a viable option for such procedures.
