Comparison of clinical outcomes and complications between translaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy and microdiscectomy in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation
10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20240426-00252
- VernacularTitle:后路经椎板间内镜与显微镜辅助髓核切除术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症
- Author:
Xinzhi ZHANG
1
;
Xinyu YANG
1
;
Suomao YUAN
1
;
Lianlei WANG
1
;
Yonghao TIAN
1
;
Xinyu LIU
1
Author Information
1. 山东大学齐鲁医院骨科，济南 250012
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Lumbar vertebrae;
Intervertebral disc displacement;
Nucleus pulposus;
Diskectomy;
Endoscopy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2025;45(1):1-9
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) and posterior small incision microdiscectomy (MD) in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 132 patients who underwent revision surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation at the same segment at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University between July 2012 and August 2022. The patients were treated with either PEID or MD. The PEID group consisted of 90 patients, including 51 males and 39 females, with a mean age of 42.7±11.3 years and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 23.7±3.4 kg/m 2. The surgical segments were L 4-5 in 38 cases and L 5S 1 in 52 cases. The primary surgeries included open discectomy in 7 cases, laminectomy with bone graft in 3 cases, MD in 35 cases, and PEID in 45 cases. The MD group consisted of 42 patients, including 30 males and 12 females, with a mean age of 41.2±12.6 years and a mean BMI of 24.3±4.7 kg/m 2. The surgical segments were L 4-5 in 19 cases and L 5S 1 in 23 cases. The primary surgeries included open discectomy in 2 cases, laminectomy with bone graft in 1 case, MD in 17 cases, and PEID in 22 cases. The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for low back pain and leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), immediate postoperative VAS score for surgical wound pain, intraoperative blood loss, surgical wound length, operation duration, length of hospital stay, and various complications before and after surgery were compared between the PEID and MD groups. Results:The operation duration in the PEID group was 81.7±11.3 min, that in the MD group was 85.2±9.5 min, but the difference was not statistically significant ( t=1.740, P=0.081). The intraoperative blood loss in the PEID group was 4.4±2.9 ml, the surgical wound length was 0.9±0.2 cm, and the length of hospital stay was 3.1±1.3 d, all significantly less than those in the MD group (26.6±10.3 ml, 3.4±1.1 cm, and 8.7±1.6 d, respectively), with statistically significant differences ( P<0.05). Both groups were followed up, with a mean follow-up duration of 24.4±5.5 months in the PEID group and 24.5±4.9 months in the MD group, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups ( t=0.101, P=0.920). Both the PEID and MD groups showed significant improvements in postoperative VAS scores for leg pain, VAS scores for low back pain, and ODI compared with preoperative values ( P<0.05). Additionally, the VAS score for surgical wound pain on the first postoperative day in the PEID group was 1.2±0.4, which was lower than that in the MD group (2.9±0.6), with a statistically significant difference ( t=19.261, P<0.001). The incidence rates of muscle weakness, postoperative sensory abnormalities, and dural tears in the PEID group were 12%(11/90), 27%(24/90), and 6%(5/90), respectively, significantly lower than those in the MD group [31%(13/42), 40%(17/42), and 33%(14/42), respectively], with statistically significant differences ( P<0.05). However, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the incidence rates of recurrence, residual nucleus pulposus, spinal cord-like hypertension syndrome, subcutaneous wound infection, or intervertebral space infection ( P>0.05). No patients in either group developed retroperitoneal hematoma postoperatively. Conclusion:For patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation after primary posterior surgery, PEID demonstrates equally excellent clinical efficacy compared with MD, with smaller surgical trauma and a lower incidence of complications.
