Therapeutic effect of endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy for the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric uncomplicated appendicitis
10.3760/cma.j.cn101070-20240708-00429
- VernacularTitle:内镜逆行阑尾炎治疗术诊治儿童非复杂性阑尾炎疗效分析
- Author:
Xuxia WEI
1
;
Junjie XU
;
Fan WU
;
Ning XUE
Author Information
1. 济南市儿童医院消化科，济南 250022
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Child;
Uncomplicated appendicitis;
Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy;
Dong cha endoscope
- From:
Chinese Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics
2025;40(1):27-32
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the effects of the endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) assisted with 3 different methods in the diagnosis and treatment of children with uncomplicated appendicitis, and to explore the most effective ERAT.Methods:A case series study was made.The clinical data of 206 children with uncomplicated appendicitis who underwent ERAT in Ji′nan Children′s Hospital from January 2019 to December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed.The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the auxiliary treatment method adopted.There were 13 cases receiving X-ray guided ERAT (ERAT-X) group, 109 cases receiving B-ultrasound guided ERAT(ERAT-B) group and 84 cases receiving dong cha endoscope guided ERAT (ERAT-DC) group.Appendix cavity exploration, irrigation and fecalith removal were performed by ERAT.Perioperative data such as endoscopic manifestations, abdominal pain and the success rate of intubation and follow-up data were recorded and compared among the three groups of patients.The one-way ANOVA method, Wilcoxon sign rank sum test and Kruskal-Wallis H test were used to analyze measurement data, and the χ2 test was used to analyze enumeration data. Results:A total of 201 cases were successfully intubated, including 12 in the ERAT-X group, 106 in the ERAT-B group, and 83 in the ERAT-DC group.The mucosa of the appendix showed different inflammatory changes under the endoscope.There were no significant differences in abdominal pain score before treatment, abdominal pain score after treatment, success rate of intubation, effective rate of treatment, complication rate, antibiotic use rate and length of hospital stay among the three groups (all P>0.05).The abdominal pain score after treatment was significantly lower than that before treatment in all the 3 groups[0(1.00) points vs.4(1.50) points/0(1.00) points vs.4(2.00) points/0(1.00) points vs.4(1.75) points, Z=-3.082, -8.939, -8.009, all P<0.05].The diagnostic rate of the ERAT-DC group was lower than that of the ERAT-B group (75.0% vs.95.4%, P<0.05).The diagnostic specificity of ERAT-DC group was better than that of the ERAT-B group.The operation time of the ERAT-DC group was significantly reduced, compared with that of ERAT-X and ERAT-B groups[38.5(34.3) min vs.85.0(42.5) min vs.67.0(27.0) min, Z=80.075, 55.865, all P<0.05].The hospitalization cost of the ERAT-DC group was significantly higher than that of ERAT-X and ERAT-B groups[(17 269±1 035) yuan vs.(12 081±921) yuan vs.(11 609±1 479) yuan, Z=-89.308, -104.633, all P<0.05].Follow-up results showed that the recurrence rate of abdominal pain (9.1%, 16.7%, 14.8%) and the rate of unplanned reoperation (9.1%, 10.8%, 8.6%) showed no significant difference among the 3 groups(ERAT-X/ERAT-B/ERAT-DC) (all P>0.05). Conclusions:ERAT is a safe and effective therapy in treating children with uncomplicated appendicitis.EART-DC is more accurate and reliable method for the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric appendicitis, so it is worthy of widespread clinical application.
