Comparative of the Polishing Effect of 3M Sof-LexTM,EVE DIAPRO and TobooM glass-ceramic on IPS e.max CAD All-ceramic Resto-rations
10.11969/j.issn.1673-548X.2025.03.022
- VernacularTitle:3M Sof-LexTM、EVE DIAPRO及道邦玻璃陶瓷对IPS e.max CAD全瓷修复体抛光效果的对比
- Author:
Man FU
1
;
Fei PEI
1
;
Aiqin LI
1
Author Information
1. 450000 郑州大学附属郑州中心医院口腔科
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
3M Sof-LexTM;
EVE DIAPRO;
TobooM glass-ceramic;
IPS e.max CAD all-ceramic;
Polishing effect
- From:
Journal of Medical Research
2025;54(3):120-125
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the effects of 3M Sof-LexTM,EVE DIAPRO and TobooM glass-ceramic polishing kits on the polishing of IPS e.max CAD all-ceramic restorations.Methods A total of 120specimens of IPS e.max CAD glass-ceramic restorations were selected and divided into 4groups according to the surface treatment method:3M group(3M Sof-LexTM polishing kit),EVE group(EVE DIAPRO polishing kit),Tob group(TobooM glass-ceramic polishing)and the control group(conventional glazing treatment),30specimens in each group.Surface roughness,gloss,Vickers hardness,fracture toughness,bacterial adhesion,pigmentation,flexural strength and degree of enamel wear were compared between the groups after treatment.Results There was no significant difference in Vickers hardness among the groups(P＞0.05);the mean deviation of contour arithmetic(Ra value)from low to high in order of control group＜3M group＜Tob group＜EVE group in descending order,the amount of bacterial adherence,the mean height of unevenness(Rz value),and the value of colour difference(ΔE value)from low to high in order of control group＜3M group＜EVE group＜Tob group in descending order,and glossiness and fracture toughness from high to low in order of control group＞3M group＞EVE group＞Tob group,flexural strength from high to low in order of 3M group＞control group＞EVE group＞Tob group,volume loss from high to low in order of control group＞Tob group＞EVE group＞3M group,there were no statistically significant differences in gloss,ΔE value,bacteri-al adhesion,volume loss among groups(P＜0.05),there were no statistically significant differences in Ra value,Rz value,fracture toughness between 3M group and control group(P＞0.05),and differed significantly from the EVE group and Tob group(P＜0.05).Conclusion Different polishing treatments can reduce IPS e.max CAD all-ceramic surface roughness,the amount of bacterial adhesion,pigmentation and enamel abrasion,and improve gloss,fracture toughness and flexural strength,of which the 3 M Sof-LexTM polishing set has the best overall effect,similar to the effect of glazing.
