Interpreting the Key Differences between CHS-DRG 2.0 and 1.1 from a Clinical Management Perspective
- VernacularTitle:临床管理视角下CHS-DRG 2.0版与CHS-DRG 1.1版重点差异研究
- Author:
Xinbing LÜ
1
;
Chunhua PAN
1
;
Xifeng SHEN
1
;
Baoyan ZHANG
1
;
Xiang LONG
1
;
Xiaokun GENG
1
;
Yingfeng WU
1
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学附属北京潞河医院 北京 101149
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
CHS-DRG 2.0;
CHS-DRG 1.1;
grouping scheme;
clinical
- From:
Chinese Health Economics
2025;44(4):50-55
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:Interpret the key differences between the China Health-care Security Diagnosis Related Groups(CHS-DRG)2.0 and CHS-DRG 1.1,and provide reference for optimizing management strategies in medical institutions.Methods:Text analysis was used to import the CHS-DRG 2.0 and 1.1 grouping scheme dictionary data into the SQL database in a structured table format using SQL Server 2014.The key differences between the two schemes in grouping structure,grouping rules,grouping results,and other aspects were identified.Results:CHS-DRG 2.0 version added 26 groups,deleted 3 groups,and refined 10 groups into 20 groups for 14 clinical specialties at the ADRG level compared to CHS-DRG 1.1.Some group codes,names,and grouping rules were adjusted;Adjusted some grouping conditions and grouping results at the DRG level.Conclusion:CHS-DRG 2.0 version has improved grouping efficiency compared to CHS-DRG 1.1,solved some clinical bottleneck problems,and standardized the role of clinical diagnosis in grouping from the perspective of resource consumption.However,it has not completely solved the grouping problems of multi disease co treatment,multi disease treatment,and combined surgery.The adjustment of DRG weights and rates,the follow-up of related supporting policy reforms,and the negative effects of DRG will still pose challenges for medical institutions.
