Effects of early enteral and parenteral nutrition support on the growth, development, and metabolomics of low-birth-weight newborns
10.3760/cma.j.cn341190-20240726-00958
- VernacularTitle:早期肠内及肠外营养支持对改善低出生体质量新生儿生长发育及代谢组学的影响
- Author:
Guojing JI
1
;
Fei YANG
1
;
Wanying GUO
1
;
Yanfeng ZHAO
1
;
Huiyuan LIU
1
Author Information
1. 杭州市妇产科医院新生儿科，杭州 310000
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Infant，low birth weight;
Infant nutrition disorders;
Nutrition therapy;
Parenteral nutrition;
Enteral nutrition;
Growth and development;
Body weight;
Glycylg
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2025;32(5):723-729
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the effects of early enteral and parenteral nutrition support on the growth, development, and metabolomics of low-birth-weight newborns.Methods:Ninety low-birth-weight newborns admitted to Hangzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital from April 2022 to April 2024 were included in this retrospective study. They were randomly divided into a control group ( n = 45) and an intervention group ( n = 45) according to different intervention methods. The control group received routine traditional nutritional support, while the intervention group received early enteral and parenteral nutrition support. Data were collected on the growth and development status of the newborns, as well as their feeding conditions. Gastric fluid pH value, frequency of bowel sounds, and level of direct bilirubin were recorded. Physical condition was also assessed. The Neonatal Behavioral Neurological Assessment (NBNA) was used to evaluate the neurobehavioral status of the newborns. Additionally, the incidence of complications was recorded for both groups, and metabolomic changes were analyzed. Results:After intervention, the control group exhibited a time to regain birth weight of (20.67 ± 8.31) days, a time to reach a body weight of 2.0 kg of (53.57 ± 12.51) days, a lowest recorded body weight of (1.32 ± 0.21) kg, a body weight loss percentage of (12.31 ± 5.52)%, and a body weight gain of (15.02 ± 2.30) g/(kg/d). In contrast, the intervention group demonstrated a time to regain birth weight of (14.31 ± 5.62) days, a time to reach a body weight of 2.0 kg of (39.21 ± 9.32) days, a lowest recorded body weight of (1.01 ± 0.17) kg, a body weight loss percentage of (7.84 ± 4.92)%, and a body weight gain of (17.74 ± 3.94) g·kg?1·d?1. All differences between the two groups were statistically significant ( t = 4.28, 9.96, 7.69, 4.05, 4.11, all P < 0.001). The difference in the lowest body weight day between the two groups of children was not statistically significant ( P > 0.05). After intervention, the control group had an initial oral feeding duration of (8.30 ± 1.37) days, with a vomiting frequency of (10.25 ± 2.20) times, a daily milk intake of (35.38 ± 3.94) mL, a gastric fluid pH value of (3.85 ± 0.20), bowel sounds of (4.94 ± 0.97) times/minute, and a direct bilirubin level of (41.98 ± 25.76) mmol/L. In contrast, the intervention group showed an initial oral feeding duration of (4.01 ± 0.76) days, a vomiting frequency of (5.61 ± 1.24) times, a daily milk intake of (43.54 ± 4.07) mL, a gastric fluid pH value of (3.41 ± 0.12), bowel sounds of (5.86 ± 1.11) times/minute, and a direct bilirubin level of (28.98 ± 18.10) mmol/L. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant ( t = 18.36, 12.32, 9.66, 12.65, 4.18, 2.77, all P < 0.05). After intervention, the control group had a body length of (40.32 ± 1.84) cm, a body weight of (1.47 ± 0.55) kg, and a head circumference of (29.21 ± 1.07) cm. The intervention group had a body length of (45.00 ± 2.16) cm, a body weight of (1.83 ± 1.03) kg, and a head circumference of (30.14 ± 1.35) cm. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant ( t = 11.06, 2.06, 3.62, all P < 0.05). At 40 weeks of corrected gestational age post-intervention, the control group had a NBNA score of (30.11 ± 2.41), whereas the intervention group had an NBNA score of (34.52 ± 2.82). The difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( t = 7.97, P < 0.05). The number of patients experiencing common complications in the intervention group was lower than that in the control group [8 (17.78%) vs. 28 (62.22%), χ2 = 18.51, P < 0.05]. The control group had glycine levels of (94.07 ± 19.78) μmol/L, valine levels of (99.53 ± 13.42) μmol/L, homocysteine levels of (10.87 ± 4.43) μmol/L, cystatin levels of (233.71 ± 35.02) μmol/L, and methionine levels of (20.54 ± 4.67) μmol/L. The intervention group had glycine levels of (79.21 ± 17.54) μmol/L,valine levels of (88.70 ± 12.96) μmol/L, homocysteine levels of (13.68 ± 7.66) μmol/L, cystatin levels of (256.54 ± 35.49) μmol/L, and methionine levels of (22.97 ± 5.49) μmol/L. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant ( t = 3.77, 3.89, 2.13, 3.07, 2.26, all P < 0.05). Conclusions:Early enteral and parenteral nutritional support for low-birth-weight infants can restore their growth and development status, improve feeding conditions, enhance gastrointestinal function, and improve levels of metabolomic-related indicators.
