Efficacy of stamp skin grafting combined with vacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers
10.3760/cma.j.cn341190-20240712-00896
- VernacularTitle:邮票植皮联合负压封闭引流技术治疗糖尿病足部溃疡的效果观察
- Author:
Xing MAO
1
;
Xiaobin CAI
1
;
Binglin WU
1
;
Shunping LIU
1
;
Yinan LAN
1
;
Xun JIANG
1
Author Information
1. 丽水市中心医院修复重建手外科，丽水 323000
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Diabetic foot;
Negative-pressure wound therapy;
Skin transplantation;
Pain measurement;
Hemodynamics
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2025;32(3):377-381
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of stamp skin grafting combined with vacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.Methods:A prospective study was conducted involving 80 patients with diabetic foot ulcers admitted to Lishui Central Hospital from January 2020 to December 2022. The patients were divided into an observation group and a control group, with 40 patients in each group, using a random number table method. The control group received treatment with vacuum-sealing drainage technology, while the observation group was treated with stamp skin grafting combined with vacuum sealing drainage. The two groups were compared based on several perioperative indicators, including wound healing time, length of hospital stay, number of dressing changes, and progress of granulation tissue growth. Pain levels were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale. Additionally, dorsalis pedis blood flow dynamics were evaluated, focusing on the diameter of the dorsalis pedis artery and arterial blood flow velocity. Foot function was assessed using the Maryland Foot Function Scale. The occurrence of postoperative complications was recorded.Results:The wound healing time and length of hospital stay in the observation group were (21.54 ± 5.32) days and (27.08 ± 5.97) days, respectively, which were significantly shorter than those in the control group [(26.69 ± 5.66) days, (31.49 ± 6.80) days, t = 4.19, 3.08, both P < 0.05]. The number of dressing changes in the observation group was (5.11 ± 1.14), which was significantly fewer than that in the control group [(8.07 ± 1.59), t = 9.56, P < 0.001]. The progress of granulation tissue growth in the observation group [(3.12 ± 0.64) mm] was faster that in the control group [(2.09 ± 0.48) mm, t = 8.14, P < 0.001]. At 1, 2, and 3 months post-surgery, the Visual Analog Scale scores for the observation group were (3.52 ± 0.65), (2.33 ± 0.42), and (1.40 ± 0.26), respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the control group [(3.96 ± 0.71), (2.74 ± 0.44), (1.78 ± 0.34), t = 2.89, 4.26, 5.615, all P < 0.05). At 3 months post-surgery, the diameter of the dorsalis pedis artery and arterial blood flow velocity in the observation group were (2.64 ± 0.44) mm and (36.42 ± 6.28) cm/s, respectively, which were greater than those in control group [(2.18 ± 0.41) mm, (30.97 ± 5.33) cm/s, t = 4.83, 4.18, both P < 0.001]. At 3 months post-surgery, the scores for pain, foot function, appearance, and range of motion in the observation group were (39.28 ± 6.70), (48.10 ± 7.22), (7.94 ± 1.54), and (12.15 ± 2.35), respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the control group [(33.46 ± 6.89), (43.08 ± 6.68), (5.38 ± 1.06), and (10.69 ± 2.16), t = 3.83, 3.22, 8.66, 2.89, all P < 0.05]. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall incidence of postoperative complications, including skin flap necrosis/dislocation, hematoma accumulation, infection, and ulcer recurrence, between the two groups ( P > 0.05). Conclusions:Stamp skin grafting combined with vacuum sealing drainage can significantly accelerate wound healing in patients with diabetic foot ulcers, reduce postoperative pain, improve dorsalis pedis blood flow dynamics, enhance foot function, and demonstrate good safety.
