Efficacy of open reduction and internal fixation versus humeral head replacement in the recovery of shoulder joint function in patients with comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus
10.3760/cma.j.cn341190-20240628-00826
- VernacularTitle:切开复位内固定与肱骨头置换术对于肱骨近端粉碎性骨折患者肩关节功能恢复的疗效比较
- Author:
Wenqiang LYU
1
;
Tao WANG
1
Author Information
1. 西安高新医院骨科，西安 710075
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Humerus;
Fractures, comminuted;
Open fracture reduction;
Fracture fixation,internal;
Arthroplasty,replacement;
Shoulder joint;
Blood loss,surgical;
Postopera
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2025;32(3):414-419
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the effect of open reduction and internal fixation versus humeral head replacement on postoperative recovery of shoulder joint function in a population of patients with comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus. Methods:This study was a case-control study that retrospectively analyzed data from 80 patients with comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus who underwent surgical treatment at the Department of Orthopedics at Xi'an Gaoxin Hospital from January 2020 to December 2023. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical method: the control group ( n = 45) received open reduction and internal fixation, while the observation group ( n = 35) underwent humeral head replacement. Surgery-related indexes, as well as therapeutic effect ratings, shoulder joint mobility, and shoulder joint function 3 months post-surgery, were compared between the two groups. Additionally, the incidence of complications occurring during the treatment was also compared between the two groups. Results:In the observation group, the intraoperative blood loss, surgery duration, postoperative drainage amount, and length of hospital stay were (186.92 ± 28.04) mL, (68.89 ± 10.12) minutes, (57.89 ± 11.25) mL, and (10.18 ± 2.41) days, respectively, all of which were significantly lower than those in the control group, which were (218.23 ± 35.57) mL, (98.26 ± 15.34) minutes, (73.65 ± 13.68) mL, and (12.35 ± 2.92) days ( t = 4.27, 9.78, 5.51, 3.55, all P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the therapeutic effect between the two groups 3 months post-surgery [97.14% (34/35) vs. 95.56% (43/45), χ2 = 0.04, P > 0.05]. At 3 months post-surgery, the angles of forward elevation, external rotation, and internal rotation in the observation group were (95.42 ± 7.88)°, (61.37 ± 6.56)°, and (74.38 ± 5.01)°, respectively, while in the control group they were (93.68 ± 7.75)°, (60.42 ± 6.87)°, and (73.75 ± 4.92)°, respectively. The differences were not statistically significant between the two groups ( t = -0.98, -0.62, -0.56, all P > 0.05). At 3 months post-surgery, the shoulder function score in the observation group was (73.46 ± 9.15), which was not significantly different from that in the control group [(71.75 ± 8.66), t = -0.85, P > 0.05]. The incidence of complications in the observation group was 2.86% (1/35), which was significantly lower than that in the control group [22.22% (10/45), χ2 = 4.70, P = 0.030). Conclusions:For patients with comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus, both open reduction and internal fixation and humeral head replacement can achieve good shoulder joint function recovery. However, humeral head replacement is more advantageous than open reduction and internal fixation during the perioperative period.
